Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32475019›Full record

Trial reportClinical and translational science2020

Pharmacokinetics of Favipiravir in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19.

Kei Irie, Atsushi Nakagawa, Hirotoshi Fujita, Ryo Tamura, Masaaki Eto, Hiroaki Ikesue, Nobuyuki Muroi, Keisuke Tomii, Tohru Hashida

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and translational science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. The efficacy and adverse effects of favipiravir on patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of published clinical trials and observational studies.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Therapeutic dilemmas in addressing SARS-CoV-2 infection: Favipiravir versus Remdesivir.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2022
    Review
  15. An update of anti-viral treatment of COVID-19Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Scoping insight on antiviral drugs against COVID-19.Arabian journal of chemistry · 2021
    Review
  19. Population pharmacokinetics of favipiravir in patients with COVID-19.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2021
    Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kei IrieDepartment of Pharmacy, Kobe City Hospital Organization, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Atsushi NakagawaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Kobe City Hospital Organization, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Hirotoshi FujitaDepartment of Pharmacy, Kobe City Hospital Organization, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Ryo TamuraDepartment of Pharmacy, Kobe City Hospital Organization, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Masaaki EtoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Kobe City Hospital Organization, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Hiroaki IkesueDepartment of Pharmacy, Kobe City Hospital Organization, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Nobuyuki MuroiDepartment of Pharmacy, Kobe City Hospital Organization, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Keisuke TomiiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Kobe City Hospital Organization, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Tohru HashidaDepartment of Pharmacy, Kobe City Hospital Organization, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since December 2019, a novel coronavirus (severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)) infection has been rapidly spreading worldwide and causing the respiratory illness, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The antiretroviral drug favipiravir (FPV) has been experimentally used for COVID-19 treatment since March 2020 in Japan. However, the pharmacokinetics of FPV in critically ill patients is unknown. We measured the serum concentration of FPV using high-performance liquid chromatography in patients with severe COVID-19 who were admitted to the intensive care unit and placed on mechanical ventilation. The patients were administered 1,600 mg of FPV twice daily on day 1, followed by 600 mg twice daily from day 2 to day 5 (or more if needed). Suspensions of FPV tablets were administered through a nasogastric tube. Seven patients were enrolled in this study. Forty-nine blood samples were obtained from the eligible patients to evaluate FPV concentration. The FPV trough (after 8-12 hours) concentrations of most samples were lower than the lower limit of quantification (1 µg/mL) and half-maximal effective concentration (9.7 µg/mL) against SARS-CoV-2 previously tested in vitro. FPV trough concentration in critically ill patients was much lower than that of healthy subjects in a previous clinical trial, which is a cause for great concern. Further study is required to determine the optimal strategy for treatment of patients with severe COVID-19.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAmidesBetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19COVID-19 Drug TreatmentCritical IllnessDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansIntubation, GastrointestinalMalePandemicsPneumonia, ViralAmidesfavipiravirPyrazinesSuspensionsTablets

Identifiers

PMID32475019
PMCPMC7300626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.