Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32474966›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of social psychology2020

A social identity perspective on COVID-19: Health risk is affected by shared group membership.

Tegan Cruwys, Mark Stevens, Katharine H Greenaway

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of social psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Connecting to Community: A Social Identity Approach to Neighborhood Mental Health.Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tegan CruwysResearch School of Psychology, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5296-3480
Mark StevensResearch School of Psychology, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Katharine H GreenawayMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.

Funding

Australian Research Council Discovery Early Career Research DE160100592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the face of a novel infectious disease, changing our collective behaviour is critical to saving lives. One determinant of risk perception and risk behaviour that is often overlooked is the degree to which we share psychological group membership with others. We outline, and summarize supporting evidence for, a theoretical model that articulates the role of shared group membership in attenuating health risk perception and increasing health risk behaviour. We emphasize the importance of attending to these processes in the context of the ongoing response to COVID-19 and conclude with three recommendations for how group processes can be harnessed to improve this response.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusGroup ProcessesHealth Risk BehaviorsSocial IdentificationAttitude to HealthCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19FemaleHealth BehaviorHumansInterpersonal RelationsMalePandemicsPerceptionPneumonia, ViralRisk Factorsbehaviour changegroup processeshealth risk perceptionrisk takingtrust

Identifiers

PMID32474966
PMCPMC7300663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.