ReviewActa neurologica Belgica2020
The sensitivity of event-related potentials/fields to logopedic interventions in patients with stroke-related aphasia.
Review in Acta neurologica Belgica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neural tracking of natural speech: an effective marker for post-stroke aphasia.Brain communications · 2025Article
- Exploring neural tracking of acoustic and linguistic speech representations in individuals with post-stroke aphasia.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- Cortical connectivity in stroke using signals from resting-state EEG: a review of current literature.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2023Review
- Aphasia recovery by language training using a brain-computer interface: a proof-of-concept study.Brain communications · 2022Article
- Therapy-Induced Electrophysiological Changes in Primary Progressive Aphasia: A Preliminary Study.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Butylphthalide soft capsules combined with modified tonic exercise therapy on neurological function and ability of daily living of patients with stroke hemiplegia.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recovery of stroke-related aphasia can be affected by language therapy in the early and chronic stage. Objectively monitoring therapy-induced neuroplasticity is possible by several measurement techniques including electro- and magneto-encephalography. The obtained event-related potentials (ERPs) and fields (ERFs) provide insights into the neural basis of intact or deficient language processing with milliseconds precision. In this literature review, we highlight the sensitivity of ERPs and ERFs to logopedic interventions by providing an overview of therapy-induced changes in the amplitude, latency and topography of early and mid-to-late components.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.