Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32474796›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2020

In silico validation of electrocardiographic imaging to reconstruct the endocardial and epicardial repolarization pattern using the equivalent dipole layer source model.

Jeanne van der Waal, Veronique Meijborg, Steffen Schuler, Ruben Coronel, Thom Oostendorp

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Electrocardiographic Imaging of Repolarization Abnormalities.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021
    Article
  4. Frontiers in physiology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jeanne van der WaalDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. jeannevanderwaal@outlook.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5471-3431
Veronique MeijborgDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Steffen SchulerInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Fritz-Haber-Weg 1, 76131, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Ruben CoronelDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Thom OostendorpDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre, Kapittelweg 29, 6525, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLKarlsruhe Institute of Technology · DERadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

Fondation Leducq RHYTHM (16CVD02)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The solution of the inverse problem of electrocardiology allows the reconstruction of the spatial distribution of the electrical activity of the heart from the body surface electrocardiogram (electrocardiographic imaging, ECGI). ECGI using the equivalent dipole layer (EDL) model has shown to be accurate for cardiac activation times. However, validation of this method to determine repolarization times is lacking. In the present study, we determined the accuracy of the EDL model in reconstructing cardiac repolarization times, and assessed the robustness of the method under less ideal conditions (addition of noise and errors in tissue conductivity). A monodomain model was used to determine the transmembrane potentials in three different excitation-repolarization patterns (sinus beat and ventricular ectopic beats) as the gold standard. These were used to calculate the body surface ECGs using a finite element model. The resulting body surface electrograms (ECGs) were used as input for the EDL-based inverse reconstruction of repolarization times. The reconstructed repolarization times correlated well (COR > 0.85) with the gold standard, with almost no decrease in correlation after adding errors in tissue conductivity of the model or noise to the body surface ECG. Therefore, ECGI using the EDL model allows adequate reconstruction of cardiac repolarization times. Graphical abstract Validation of electrocardiographic imaging for repolarization using forward calculated body surface ECGs from simulated activation-repolarization sequences.

Indexed as

AdultBody Surface Potential MappingComputer SimulationDiagnostic ImagingElectrocardiographyEndocardiumEpicardial MappingHumansMyocardiumCardiac arrhythmiasElectrocardiographic imaging (ECGI)Equivalent dipole layerInverse problem of ECGRepolarization

Identifiers

PMID32474796
PMCPMC7340677
OpenAlexW3031418675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.