Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32474794›Full record

ReviewHeart failure reviews2021

Clinical inertia in the treatment of heart failure: a major issue to tackle.

Caroline Verhestraeten, Ward A Heggermont, Michael Maris

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heart failure reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07252310 (Pilot Study of Acceptability and Feasibility of StudyU for N-of-1 Trials), which is not on this map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07252310 phase4enrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Pilot Study of Acceptability and Feasibility of StudyU for N-of-1 Trials

TypeinterventionalSponsorWeill Medical College of Cornell UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled5ConditionsHFrEF - Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Heart Failure, Heart Failure, Systolic, Heart DiseasesArmsbeta blockers, StudyU Application
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Caroline VerhestraetenNovartis Pharma nv-sa, Medialaan 40, 1800, Vilvoorde, Belgium.
Ward A HeggermontCardiovascular Center OLV Aalst, Moorselbaan 164, 9300, Aalst, Belgium.
Michael MarisNovartis Pharma nv-sa, Medialaan 40, 1800, Vilvoorde, Belgium. michael.maris@novartis.com.
Novartis (Belgium) · BEOnze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite an enormous improvement in heart failure management during the last decades, the hospitalization and mortality rate of heart failure patients still remain very high. Clinical inertia, defined as the lack of treatment intensification in a patient not at evidence-based goals for care, is an important underlying cause. Clinical inertia is extensively described in hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus, but increasingly recognized in heart failure as well. Given the well-established guidelines for the management of heart failure, these are still not being reflected in clinical practice. While the absolute majority of patients were treated by guideline-directed heart failure drugs, only a small percentage of these patients reached the correct guideline-recommended target dose of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors. This considerable under-treatment leads to a large number of avoidable hospitalizations and deaths. This review discusses clinical inertia in heart failure and explains its major contributing factors (i.e., physician, patient, and system) and touches upon some recommendations to prevent clinical inertia and ameliorate heart failure treatment.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Heart FailureAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsHumansMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsStroke VolumeAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsClinical inertiaGuideline-directed treatmentHeart failureTarget doseUnder-treatment

Identifiers

PMID32474794
PMCPMC8510913
OpenAlexW3032672310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.