ArticleJournal of endocrinological investigation2021
Importance of total and measured free testosterone in diagnosis of male hypogonadism: immunoassay versus mass spectrometry in a population of healthy young/middle-aged blood donors.
Article in Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Simultaneous quantification of total and free testosterone in human serum by LC-MS/MS.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2023Article
- Hypogonadism and urologic surgeries: a narrative review.Translational andrology and urology · 2022Review
- Serum concentrations of dihydrotestosterone are associated with symptoms of hypogonadism in biochemically eugonadal men.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo meet clinicians' request for adequate results and reliable reference ranges for testosterone, this study was planned with the aims (i) to verify the reliability of the reference interval for total testosterone (TT) declared by immunoassay manufacturer and adopted by laboratory, (ii) to compare results for serum TT obtained by immunoassay and LC-MS/MS and (iii) to verify if the cutoff values for low TT and measured free testosterone (FT), defined by Endocrine Society Guidelines for diagnosis of hypogonadism, are applicable to our study group.
methodsSera from anonymous young/middle-aged male blood donors were selected for the study. TT was measured by immunoassay and LC-MS/MS. SHBG was measured by immunoassay and used with albumin concentration to calculate FT according to Vermeulen's formula.
resultsThe reference interval declared by the manufacturer and adopted by the lab was validated. The two methods for TT evaluation correlated very well. TT and FT lower limits at 5th and 2.5th percentile are below the cutoffs reported in the literature for the diagnosis of hypogonadism.
conclusionsThe immunoassay currently used in our lab can be considered an adequate tool for TT, but it's essential that clinical data agree with the biochemical ones, particularly in the presence of TT values between the lower limit of reference range and the cutoff values recommended by scientific societies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.