Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32474710›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of colorectal disease2020

Ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block in patients undergoing open hemorrhoidectomy: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Matteo Di Giuseppe, Andrea Saporito, Davide La Regina, Edoardo Tasciotti, Enea Ghielmini, Alberto Vannelli, Ramon Pini, Francesco Mongelli

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of colorectal disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04251884 nacompletednot on this map

Pudendal Nerve Block in Patient Treated for Hemorrhoidectomy Under Spinal Anaesthesia: Prospective Randomized Double-blind Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorFrancesco MongelliRan2018 to 2020Enrolled49ConditionsHemorrhoids, Postoperative PainArmsLocal anesthetic (ropivacaine)
NCT07029087 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Pudendal Block on Postoperative Analgesia in Urogynecological Surgeries

TypeinterventionalSponsorGiresun UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled58ConditionsUrinary IncontinenceArmsPudendal Nerve Block
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Ultrasound-guidedBJA open · 2025
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Matteo Di GiuseppeSurgery, Ospedale Regionale di Bellinzona e Valli, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Andrea SaporitoAnesthesiology, Ospedale Regionale di Bellinzona e Valli, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Davide La ReginaSurgery, Ospedale Regionale di Bellinzona e Valli, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Edoardo TasciottiAnesthesiology, Ospedale Regionale di Bellinzona e Valli, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Enea GhielminiSurgery, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Alberto VannelliSurgery, Ospedale Valduce, Como, Italy.
Ramon PiniSurgery, Ospedale Regionale di Bellinzona e Valli, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Francesco MongelliSurgery, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, 6900, Lugano, Switzerland. francesco.mongelli@mail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8824-651X
Ospedale Regionale di Bellinzona e Valli · CHOspedale regionale di Lugano · CHOspedale Valduce · ITUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn this double-blind randomized trial, we aimed to compare the postoperative pain, complications, and length of hospital stay in patients undergoing open hemorrhoidectomy under spinal anesthesia with or without the pudendal nerve block.

methodsPatients undergoing Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy under spinal anesthesia were randomized to undergo a pudendal nerve block or no intervention. Postoperative pain on the visual analogue scale (VAS) at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h; opioid administration; and length of hospital stay were recorded and analyzed.

resultsOver the study period, 49 patients were included and 23 randomized in the treatment arm. No differences in terms of age, gender, and preoperative risk factors were noted between groups. The pain on the VAS at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h was 2.8 vs. 4.6 (p = 0.046), 3.4 vs. 4.7 (p = 0.697), 1.4 vs. 3.1 (p = 0.016), and 1.0 vs. 2.1 (p = 0.288) in the treatment and control groups respectively. No differences in opioids use or complications were noted. Length of hospital stay was 1.2 vs. 1.8 days respectively (p = 0.046). No complications directly associated to the pudendal nerve block were observed. Multivariate analysis revealed that the pudendal nerve block was an independent factor reducing the postoperative pain.

conclusionsThe ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block in patients undergoing open hemorrhoidectomy under spinal anesthesia showed a statistically significant reduction in postoperative pain and length of hospital stay. The proposed technique appeared to be safe and feasible and may be recommendable in patients undergoing open hemorrhoidectomy.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04251884.

Indexed as

HemorrhoidectomyHemorrhoidsNerve BlockPudendal NerveDouble-Blind MethodHumansPostoperative PainUltrasonography, InterventionalAnestheticBlockHemorrhoidectomyNervePudendal

Identifiers

PMID32474710
OpenAlexW3032687059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.