Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32474650›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2020

Efficacy of teriparatide compared with risedronate on FRAX

J-J Body, F Marin, D L Kendler, C A F Zerbini, P López-Romero, R Möricke, E Casado, A Fahrleitner-Pammer, J J Stepan, E Lespessailles and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01709110 (Teriparatide and Risedronate in the Treatment of Patients With Severe Postmenopausal Osteoporosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01709110 phase4completednot on this map

Teriparatide and Risedronate in the Treatment of Patients With Severe Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: Comparative Effects on Vertebral Fractures

TypeinterventionalSponsorEli Lilly and CompanyRan2012 to 2016Enrolled1,366ConditionsPostmenopausal OsteoporosisArmsTeriparatide, Risedronate, Placebo, Calcium, Vitamin D
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Fragility of Evidence for the Efficacy of Anti-Fracture Medications.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025
    Article
  10. Characteristics and treatment options of 272,152 geriatric patients with very high and high fracture risk.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. An assessment of intervention thresholds for very high fracture risk applied to the NOGG guidelines : A report for the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG).Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Article
  18. Risk factors for imminent fractures: a substudy of the FRISBEE cohort.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 11 institutions in 10 countries.

J-J BodyCHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium. jean-jacques.body@chu-brugmann.be.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9165-1444
F MarinLilly Research Center Europe, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2899-9840
D L KendlerUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7679-3965
C A F ZerbiniCentro Paulista de Investigaçao Clínica, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6269-2354
P López-RomeroLilly Research Center Europe, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9066-1109
R MörickeInstitut Präventive Medizin & Klinische Forschung, Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8830-9974
E CasadoUniversity Hospital Parc Taulí Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8839-6430
A Fahrleitner-PammerDivision of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5590-0888
J J StepanInstitute of Rheumatology and Faculty of Medicine 1, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1541-8306
E LespessaillesRegional Hospital, University of Orleans, Orleans, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1009-8518
S MinisolaSapienza Rome University, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6525-0439
P GeusensMaastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7547-9146
Eli Lilly (Spain) · ESCentro Paulista de Investigação Clinica · BRCharles University · CZDeleted InstitutionIPPMed (Germany) · DEMaastricht University · NLMedical University of Graz · ATSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversité d'Orléans · FRUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BEUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

FRAX

introductionThe VERO trial was an active-controlled fracture endpoint clinical trial that enrolled postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis. After 24 months, a 52% reduction in the hazard ratio (HR) of clinical fractures was reported in patients randomized to teriparatide compared with risedronate. We examined fracture results restricted to FRAX

methodsIn total, 1360 postmenopausal women (mean age 72.1 years) were randomized to receive subcutaneous daily teriparatide (20 μg) or oral weekly risedronate (35 mg). Patient cumulative incidence of ≥ 1 FRAX

resultsAfter 24 months, 16 (2.6%) patients in the teriparatide group had ≥ 1 low trauma FRAX

conclusionIn postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis, treatment with teriparatide was more efficacious than risedronate, with a 60% lower risk of FRAX CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01709110 EudraCT Number: 2012-000123-41.

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalOsteoporotic FracturesAgedBone DensityDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansRisedronic AcidTeriparatideBone Density Conservation AgentsRisedronic AcidTeriparatideBisphosphonatesFracturesFRAX®OsteoporosisRisedronateTeriparatide

Identifiers

PMID32474650
PMCPMC7497508
OpenAlexW3029934388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.