Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32474637›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2020

Levator avulsion and vaginal parity: do subsequent vaginal births matter?

H P Dietz, C Walsh, N Subramaniam, T Friedman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Female pelvic floor protection-Where do we have to go?Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Ultrasound imaging of maternal birth trauma.International urogynecology journal · 2021
    Review
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

H P DietzDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Neonatology, Sydney Medical School Nepean, The University of Sydney, 62 Derby Street, Kingswood, NSW 2747, Australia. hpdietz@bigpond.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2211-6149
C WalshDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Neonatology, Sydney Medical School Nepean, The University of Sydney, 62 Derby Street, Kingswood, NSW 2747, Australia.
N SubramaniamDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Neonatology, Sydney Medical School Nepean, The University of Sydney, 62 Derby Street, Kingswood, NSW 2747, Australia.
T FriedmanDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Neonatology, Sydney Medical School Nepean, The University of Sydney, 62 Derby Street, Kingswood, NSW 2747, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisTears of the levator ani muscle are common after vaginal birth and associated with pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Although such trauma is usually attributed to the first vaginal birth, epidemiological evidence suggests an additional effect of subsequent vaginal deliveries. Our hypothesis was: "The prevalence of avulsion increases with the number of vaginal births".

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study in patients who presented to a tertiary urogynaecology clinic. Assessment included a physician-directed interview, POP-Q and 4D translabial ultrasound (TLUS), supine, after voiding, at rest, on maximum pelvic floor muscle contraction (PFMC) and Valsalva. Offline analysis of levator integrity was undertaken by tomographic imaging (TUI) at a later date, blinded against all other data.

resultsA total of 1,124 patients had been seen between 1 January 2014 and 30 June 2016, on average 33 (0.32-69.7) years after their first birth. Mean age was 56 (19-90) years. 1,012 (90%) were vaginally parous with a median vaginal parity of 2 (1-8). On TUI, avulsion was diagnosed in 257 (23%) women, all of whom were vaginally parous. On univariate analysis, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of avulsion on comparing vaginally primiparous and multiparous women (P = 0.6), nor was there any difference between vaginal parity groups (one, two, three, and ≥4 births; p = 0.7). This remained true after controlling for potential confounding factors using multivariate regression (p = 0.6).

conclusionsThere was no significant difference in the prevalence of avulsion between vaginally primiparous and multiparous women. Vaginal deliveries after a first vaginal birth are unlikely to cause avulsion.

Indexed as

Pelvic FloorPelvic Organ ProlapseFemaleHumansMiddle AgedParityParturitionPregnancyRetrospective StudiesUltrasonographyAvulsionPelvic organ prolapseTomographic imagingTranslabial ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID32474637
OpenAlexW3029496795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.