ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2020
Levator avulsion and vaginal parity: do subsequent vaginal births matter?
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Female pelvic floor protection-Where do we have to go?Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Review
- Image-Quality Assessment of the Levator Ani Immediately After Delivery.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- The Evolution of Pelvic Floor Ultrasound: From Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse to Maternal Birth Trauma, Levator Avulsion and Anal Sphincter Tears.International urogynecology journal · 2026Review
- Analysis of questions by patients with pelvic organ prolapse about vaginal pessaries resulting in a checklist for their physicians.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Article
- Ultrasound imaging of maternal birth trauma.International urogynecology journal · 2021Review
- The effect of replacing vacuum with forceps in operative vaginal delivery: an observational study.International urogynecology journal · 2020Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisTears of the levator ani muscle are common after vaginal birth and associated with pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Although such trauma is usually attributed to the first vaginal birth, epidemiological evidence suggests an additional effect of subsequent vaginal deliveries. Our hypothesis was: "The prevalence of avulsion increases with the number of vaginal births".
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study in patients who presented to a tertiary urogynaecology clinic. Assessment included a physician-directed interview, POP-Q and 4D translabial ultrasound (TLUS), supine, after voiding, at rest, on maximum pelvic floor muscle contraction (PFMC) and Valsalva. Offline analysis of levator integrity was undertaken by tomographic imaging (TUI) at a later date, blinded against all other data.
resultsA total of 1,124 patients had been seen between 1 January 2014 and 30 June 2016, on average 33 (0.32-69.7) years after their first birth. Mean age was 56 (19-90) years. 1,012 (90%) were vaginally parous with a median vaginal parity of 2 (1-8). On TUI, avulsion was diagnosed in 257 (23%) women, all of whom were vaginally parous. On univariate analysis, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of avulsion on comparing vaginally primiparous and multiparous women (P = 0.6), nor was there any difference between vaginal parity groups (one, two, three, and ≥4 births; p = 0.7). This remained true after controlling for potential confounding factors using multivariate regression (p = 0.6).
conclusionsThere was no significant difference in the prevalence of avulsion between vaginally primiparous and multiparous women. Vaginal deliveries after a first vaginal birth are unlikely to cause avulsion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.