Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32474609›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2020

Environmental pressures on stomatal size may drive plant genome size evolution: evidence from a natural experiment with Cape geophytes.

Pavel Veselý, Petr Šmarda, Petr Bureš, Charles Stirton, A Muthama Muasya, Ladislav Mucina, Lucie Horová, Kristýna Veselá, Alexandra Šilerová, Jakub Šmerda and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Chromosome-scale reference genome ofApplications in plant sciences
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Pavel VeselýDepartment of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Kotlářská, Brno, Czech Republic.
Petr ŠmardaDepartment of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Kotlářská, Brno, Czech Republic.
Petr BurešDepartment of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Kotlářská, Brno, Czech Republic.
Charles StirtonBolus Herbarium, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town, South Africa.
A Muthama MuasyaBolus Herbarium, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town, South Africa.
Ladislav MucinaIluka Chair in Vegetation Science and Biogeography, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Perth, Australia.
Lucie HorováDepartment of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Kotlářská, Brno, Czech Republic.
Kristýna VeseláDepartment of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Kotlářská, Brno, Czech Republic.
Alexandra ŠilerováDepartment of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Kotlářská, Brno, Czech Republic.
Jakub ŠmerdaDepartment of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Kotlářská, Brno, Czech Republic.
Ondřej KnápekDepartment of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Kotlářská, Brno, Czech Republic.
Masaryk University · CZUniversity of Cape Town · ZAStellenbosch University · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsThe idea that genome (size) evolution in eukaryotes could be driven by environmental factors is still vigorously debated. In extant plants, genome size correlates positively with stomatal size, leading to the idea that conditions enabling the existence of large stomata in fossil plants also supported growth of their genome size. We test this inductive assumption in drought-adapted, prostrate-leaved Cape (South Africa) geophytes where, compared with their upright-leaved geophytic ancestors, stomata develop in a favourably humid microclimate formed underneath their leaves.

methodsStomatal parameters (leaf cuticle imprints) and genome size (flow cytometry) were measured in 16 closely related geophytic species pairs from seven plant families. In each pair, representing a different genus, we contrasted a prostrate-leaved species with its upright-leaved phylogenetic relative, the latter whose stomata are exposed to the ambient arid climate. KEY

resultsExcept for one, all prostrate-leaves species had larger stomata, and in 13 of 16 pairs they also had larger genomes than their upright-leaved relatives. Stomatal density and theoretical maximum conductance were less in prostrate-leaved species with small guard cells (<1 pL) but showed no systematic difference in species pairs with larger guard cells (>1 pL). Giant stomata were observed in the prostrate-leaved Satyrium bicorne (89-137 µm long), despite its relatively small genome (2C = 9 Gbp).

conclusionsOur results imply that climate, through selection on stomatal size, might be able to drive genome size evolution in plants. The data support the idea that plants from 'greenhouse' geological periods with large stomata might have generally had larger genome sizes when compared with extant plants, though this might not have been solely due to higher atmospheric CO2 in these periods but could also have been due to humid conditions prevailing at fossil deposit sites.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantGenome SizePhylogenyPlant LeavesPlant StomataSouth AfricaCape Floristic Regioncarbon dioxideflow cytometryfossil plantsgenome size evolutiongeophytepaleoclimateSouth Africastomatal size

Identifiers

PMID32474609
PMCPMC7380457
OpenAlexW3032062935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.