Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32474570›Full record

ReviewBone marrow transplantation2020

Value and affordability of CAR T-cell therapy in the United States.

Salvatore Fiorenza, David S Ritchie, Scott D Ramsey, Cameron J Turtle, Joshua A Roth

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Bone marrow transplantation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cardiotoxicity of T cell immunotherapies.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026
    Review
  12. Hydrodynamic dispersion drives viral-cellular contact for gene delivery in porous media.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Adoptive T-cell therapies in the clinic.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. An Indigenous Workflow for Generating CD19 CAR-T Cells.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  20. Review

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Salvatore FiorenzaClinical Research Division and Integrated Immunotherapy Research Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
David S RitchieDepartment of Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Scott D RamseyHutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Cameron J TurtleClinical Research Division and Integrated Immunotherapy Research Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Joshua A RothHutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA. jroth@fredhutch.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6621-8342

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the United States the increasing number of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved, innovative, and potentially effective commercial cancer therapies pose a significant financial burden on public and private payers. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are prototypical of this challenge. In 2017 and 2018, tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah, Novartis) and axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta, Kite) were approved by the FDA for use after showing groundbreaking results in relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies. In 2020 and 2021, four further submissions to the FDA are expected for CAR T-cell therapies for indolent and aggressive B-cell malignancies and plasma cell myeloma. Yet, with marketed prices of over $350,000 per infusion for the two FDA-approved therapies and similar price tags expected for the coming products, serious concerns are raised over value and affordability. In this review we summarize recent, peer-reviewed cost-effectiveness studies of tisagenlecleucel and axicabtagene ciloleucel in the United States; discuss key issues concerning the health plan budget impact of CAR T-cell therapy; and review policy, payment and scientific approaches that may improve the value and affordability of CAR T-cell therapy.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansReceptors, Antigen, T-CellUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.