ArticleBMJ open2020
Development and evaluation of a patient-centred program for low anterior resection syndrome: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03828318 (Impact of a Patient-Centered Program for Low Anterior Resection Syndrome a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Impact of a Patient-Centered Program for Low Anterior Resection Syndrome a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Role of Patient Education in Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: A Systematic Review.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025Pooled it
- The impact of an interactive online informational and peer support application (app) for patients with low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) on quality of life: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Trial
- Development of a CORe outcome set for clinical trials of RECTal cancer treatment: protocol for the CORRECT initiative.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Evaluation and Management.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2026Review
- Article
- Enhancing support for patients with low anterior resection syndrome: insights and educational resources from the LARSCAT project.International journal of colorectal disease · 2024Article
- Implications of IFNγ SNP rs2069705 in primary Sjögren's syndrome: transcriptional activation and B cell infiltration.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2024Article
- The use of patient-generated health data in the management of low anterior resection syndrome: a qualitative study.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Article
- Article
- Management guidelines for low anterior resection syndrome - the MANUEL project.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLow anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is described as disordered bowel function after rectal resection that leads to a detriment in quality of life, and affects the majority of individuals following restorative proctectomy for rectal cancer. The management of LARS includes personalised troubleshooting and effective self-management behaviours. Thus, affected individuals need to be well informed and appropriately engaged in their own LARS management. This manuscript describes the development of a LARS patient-centred programme (LPCP) and the study protocol for its evaluation in a randomised controlled trial. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This will be a multicentre, randomised, assessor-blind, parallel-groups, pragmatic trial evaluating the impact of an LPCP, consisting of an informational booklet, patient diaries and nurse support, on patient-reported outcomes after restorative proctectomy for rectal cancer. The informational booklet was developed by a multidisciplinary LARS team, and was vetted in a focus group and semistructured interviews involving patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals. The primary outcome will be global quality of life (QoL), as measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30), at 6 months after surgery. The treatment effect on global QoL will be modelled using generalised estimating equations. Secondary outcomes include symptom change, patient activation, bowel function measures, emotional distress, knowledge about LARS and satisfaction with the LPCP. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Research Ethics Committee (REC) at the Integrated Health and Social Services Network for West-Central Montreal (health network responsible for the Jewish General Hospital) is the overseeing REC for all Quebec sites. They have granted ethical approval (MP-05-2019-1628) for all Quebec hospitals (Jewish General Hospital, McGill University Health Center, CHU de Quebec) and have granted full authorisation to begin research at the Jewish General Hospital. Patient recruitment will not begin at the other Quebec sites until inter-institutional contracts are finalised and feasibility/authorisation for research is granted by their respective REC. The results of this study will be presented at national and international conferences, and a manuscript with results will be submitted for publication in a high-impact peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03828318; Pre-results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.