Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32474399›Full record

ReviewEBioMedicine2020

Infectivity of human coronavirus in the brain.

Qi Cheng, Yue Yang, Jianqun Gao

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EBioMedicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. A suitable model to investigate acute neurological consequences of coronavirus infection.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Olfactory Dysfunction is Associated with More Severe Clinical Course in COVID-19.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Qi ChengDepartment of Neurology and Neurophysiology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Stroke and Neurology Research Group, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Yue YangBrain and Mind Centre, Central Clinical School, the University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Jianqun GaoBrain and Mind Centre, Central Clinical School, the University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: drgaojqun@icloud.com.
The University of Sydney · AULiverpool Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A new strain of human coronaviruses (hCoVs), Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), has been identified to be responsible for the current outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Though major symptoms are primarily generated from the respiratory system, neurological symptoms are being reported in some of the confirmed cases, raising concerns of its potential for intracranial invasion and neurological manifestations, both in the acute phase and in the long-term. At present, it remains unclear the extent to which SARS-CoV-2 is present in the brain, and if so, its pathogenic role in the central nervous system (CNS). Evidence for neuroinvasion and neurovirulence of hCoVs has been recognised in animal and human studies. Given that SARS-CoV-2 belongs to the same family and shares characteristics in terms of receptor binding properties, it is worthwhile exploring its potential CNS manifestations. This review summarises previous findings from hCoVs in relation to the CNS, and compares these with the new strain, aiming to provide a better understanding of the effects of SARS-CoV-2 on the CNS.

Indexed as

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2AnimalsBetacoronavirusBrainCentral Nervous SystemCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4HumansMiddle East Respiratory Syndrome CoronavirusPandemicsPeptidyl-Dipeptidase APneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2Viral ProteinsACE2 protein, humanAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4Peptidyl-Dipeptidase AViral ProteinsBrainCoronavirusHumanNeuroinvasionNeurological manifestationSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID32474399
PMCPMC7255711
OpenAlexW3030147202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.