Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32474348›Full record

ArticlePsychoneuroendocrinology2020

Relationship satisfaction predicts lower stress and inflammation in breast cancer survivors: A longitudinal study of within-person and between-person effects.

M Rosie Shrout, Megan E Renna, Annelise A Madison, Catherine M Alfano, Stephen P Povoski, Adele M Lipari, Doreen M Agnese, Lisa D Yee, William E Carson, Janice K Kiecolt-Glaser

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Couple communication in cancer: A tale of two conceptual models.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

M Rosie ShroutInstitute for Behavioral Medicine Research, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA. Electronic address: Rosie.Shrout@osumc.edu.
Megan E RennaInstitute for Behavioral Medicine Research, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
Annelise A MadisonInstitute for Behavioral Medicine Research, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA; Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Catherine M AlfanoAmerican Cancer Society, Inc., Atlanta, GA, USA.
Stephen P PovoskiComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA; Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
Adele M LipariComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA; Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
Doreen M AgneseComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA; Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
Lisa D YeeDepartment of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
William E CarsonComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA; Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
Janice K Kiecolt-GlaserInstitute for Behavioral Medicine Research, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
The Ohio State University · USInstitute for Behavioral Medicine · USAmerican Cancer Society · USCity of Hope · US

Funding

Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Tasleem J Padamsee · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
The Ohio State University Center for Clinical and Translational Science (UL1)UL1TR000090 · NCATS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JACKSON, REBECCA D · 2012 to 2013
$7.9M
Fatigue, Depression, and Inflammation in Cancer Survivors: A Prospective StudyR01CA131029 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KIECOLT-GLASER, JANICE · 2008 to 2013
$4.1M
Biobehavioral Influences on Cancer: Perspectives from PsychoneuroimmunologyK05CA172296 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KIECOLT-GLASER, JANICE · 2013 to 2017
$426k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000090NCI NIH HHS K05 CA172296NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058NCI NIH HHS R01 CA131029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer survivors with elevated inflammation have a greater risk for cancer recurrence, premature mortality, and comorbid disease development. The psychological stress survivors experience when confronted with a breast cancer diagnosis and cancer treatment can heighten inflammation. Identifying factors that reduce stress and inflammation could lead to improvements in survivors' long-term health. Accordingly, this study examined the health-enhancing effects of romantic relationships-a key health determinant-on breast cancer survivors' stress and inflammation.

methodsBreast cancer survivors (n = 139, stages 0-IIIC) completed a baseline visit before treatment and two follow-up visits 6 and 18 months after treatment ended. Women completed self-report questionnaires assessing their romantic relationship satisfaction and perceived stress, and they provided a blood sample for serum markers of inflammation at each visit. The longitudinal design allowed for examination within and between survivors. We conducted multilevel mediation analyses to assess how changes in survivors' relationship satisfaction were related to changes in stress and inflammation from visit to visit (i.e., within-person effects), as well as how the average effects of relationship satisfaction were associated with average stress and inflammation levels throughout the study (i.e., between-person effects).

resultsAt the within-person level, at visits in which survivors were more satisfied with their relationships, they also perceived less stress, which in turn was related to lower than their own average levels of serum C-reactive protein and proinflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-6, and interleukin-1β). At the between-person level, survivors who had greater relationship satisfaction throughout the study had lower perceived stress, which was linked to lower levels of inflammation.

conclusionBreast cancer survivors in satisfying romantic relationships felt less stressed and in turn had lower inflammation throughout cancer treatment. This study illustrates the utility of a within-person approach to not only consider the average effects of relationship satisfaction, but also how changes in their own relationship satisfaction impact stress and inflammation over time. Our findings demonstrate important psychological and immunological pathways through which satisfying relationships may promote breast cancer survivors' long-term health.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsPersonal SatisfactionAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsFemaleHumansIndividualityInflammationLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedPrognosisQuality of LifeSocial SupportCancer survivorsHealthInflammationRomantic relationshipsStress

Identifiers

PMID32474348
PMCPMC7307603
OpenAlexW3026139346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.