Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32474213›Full record

ArticleVision research2020

Visual discomfort from flicker: Effects of mean light level and contrast.

Sanae Yoshimoto, Fang Jiang, Tatsuto Takeuchi, Arnold J Wilkins, Michael A Webster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vision research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sanae YoshimotoGraduate School of Integrated Arts and Sciences, Hiroshima University, Kagamiyama 1-7-1, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8521, Japan. Electronic address: syoshimo@hiroshima-u.ac.jp.
Fang JiangDepartment of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, 1664 N. Virginia Street, Reno, Nevada 89557, USA.
Tatsuto TakeuchiDepartment of Psychology, Japan Women's University, Tama-ku Nishi-ikuta 1-1-1, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 214-8565, Japan.
Arnold J WilkinsDepartment of Psychology, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK.
Michael A WebsterDepartment of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, 1664 N. Virginia Street, Reno, Nevada 89557, USA.

Funding

SALIENCE, ADAPTATION, AND NATURAL IMAGE STATISTICSR01EY010834 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI WEBSTER, MICHAEL A · 2000 to 2023
$4.6M
Cross-modal motion responses in blind and deaf humansR00EY023268 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI JIANG, FANG · 2015 to 2017
$747k
Cross-modal motion responses in blind and deaf humansK99EY023268 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JIANG, FANG · 2013 to 2014
$191k
COLOR CONTRAST ADAPTATIONR29EY010834 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI WEBSTER, MICHAEL A · 1995 to 1999
–
NEI NIH HHS K99 EY023268NEI NIH HHS R00 EY023268NEI NIH HHS R01 EY010834NEI NIH HHS R29 EY010834
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uncomfortable images generally have a particular spatial structure, which deviates from a reciprocal relationship between amplitude and spatial frequency (f) in the Fourier domain (1/f). Although flickering patterns with similar temporal structure also appear uncomfortable, the discomfort is affected by not only the amplitude spectrum but also the phase spectrum. Here we examined how discomfort from flicker with differing temporal profiles also varies as a function of the mean light level and luminance contrast of the stimulus. Participants were asked to rate discomfort for a 17° flickering uniform field at different light levels from scotopic to photopic. The flicker waveform was varied with a square wave or random phase spectrum and filtered by modulating the slope of the amplitude spectrum relative to 1/f. At photopic levels, the 1/f square wave flicker appeared most comfortable, whereas the discomfort from the random flicker increased monotonically as the slope of the amplitude spectrum decreased. This special status for the 1/f square wave condition was limited to photopic light levels. At the lower mesopic or scotopic levels, the effect of phase spectrum on the discomfort was diminished, with both phase spectra showing a monotonic change with the slope of the amplitude spectrum. We show that these changes cannot be accounted for by changes in the effective luminance contrast of the stimuli or by the responses from a linear model based on the temporal impulse responses under different light levels. However, discomfort from flicker is robustly correlated with judgments of the perceived naturalness of flicker across different contrasts and mean luminance levels.

Indexed as

LightAdaptation, OcularAdultContrast SensitivityFemaleFlicker FusionHumansMaleRetinaVision DisordersYoung Adult1/f amplitude spectrumContrastFlickerRetinal illuminanceVisual discomfort

Identifiers

PMID32474213
PMCPMC7311306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.