Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32473057›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2020

Opportunities for changes in the drug product design to enhance medication safety in older people: Evaluation of a national public portal for medication incidents.

Fatma Karapinar-Çarkit, Patricia M L A van den Bemt, Mariam Sadik, Brigit van Soest, Wilma Knol, Florence van Hunsel, Diana A van Riet-Nales

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Fatma Karapinar-ÇarkitDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, OLVG hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3077-9663
Patricia M L A van den BemtDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1418-5520
Mariam SadikDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, OLVG hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Brigit van SoestRoyal Pharmaceutical Society in the Netherlands (KNMP), The Hague, The Netherlands.
Wilma KnolDepartment of Geriatric Medicine and Expertise Centre Pharmacotherapy in Old Persons (EPHOR), University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Florence van HunselNetherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
Diana A van Riet-NalesMedicines Evaluation Board, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4902-4519
OLVG · NLKoninklijke Nederlandse Chemische Vereniging · NLMedicines Evaluation Board · NLNetherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsMedication safety requires urgent attention in hospital pharmacy. This study evaluated the medication-related problems/errors as reported to the Dutch medication incident registry and disseminated for information to pharmacists. Through analysis by an expert panel we aimed to better understand which problems could have been mitigated by the drug product design. Additionally, the (wider) implications of the problems for current hospital/clinical practice were discussed.

methodsItems were extracted from the public Portal for Patient Safety. Items were included if relevant for older people and connected with the drug product design and excluded if they should reasonably have been intercepted by compliance to routine controls or well-known professional standards in pharmaceutical care. To explore any underreporting of well-known incidents, it was investigated if different medication-related problems could be observed in a regional hospital practise over a 1-month period. For 6 included items (cases), the implications for hospital/clinical practise were discussed in an expert panel.

resultsIn total, 307 items were identified in the Portal for Patient Safety; all but 14 were excluded. Six cases were added from daily hospital practice. These 20 cases commonly related to confusing product characteristics, packaging issues such as the lack of a single unit package for an oncolytic product, or incorrect or incomplete user instructions.

conclusionMedication registries provide important opportunities to evaluate real-world medication-related problems. However, underreporting of well-known problems should be considered. The product design can be used as an (additional) risk mitigation measure to support medication safety in hospital practice.

Indexed as

Pharmaceutical PreparationsPharmacy Service, HospitalAgedHospitalsHumansMedication ErrorsPatient SafetyPharmacistsPharmaceutical Preparationsagedaged 80 and overdrug labellinghospitalmedication errorspharmaceuticalpharmaceutical preparationspharmacy servicetechnology

Identifiers

PMID32473057
PMCPMC7495303
OpenAlexW3028739225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.