Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32472950›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2020

The Clinical Significance of Neuroendocrine Features in Invasive Breast Carcinomas.

Billy Shui-Wun Lai, Julia Y Tsang, Ivan K Poon, Yan Shao, Siu-Ki Chan, Fiona K Tam, Sai-Yin Cheung, Ka-Ho Shea, Gary M Tse

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Primary Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of Breast: Changing Paradigm.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the breast: a review of literature.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms of the breast and its clinical relevance.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Clinical and genomic analyses of neuroendocrine neoplasms of the breast.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Breast cancer with neuroendocrine differentiation: an update based on the latest WHO classification.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Billy Shui-Wun LaiDepartment of Pathology, North District Hospital, Hong Kong.
Julia Y TsangDepartment of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Ngan Shing Street, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong.
Ivan K PoonDepartment of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Ngan Shing Street, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong.
Yan ShaoDepartment of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Ngan Shing Street, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong.
Siu-Ki ChanDepartment of Pathology, Kwong Wah Hospital, Hong Kong.
Fiona K TamDepartment of Pathology, Kwong Wah Hospital, Hong Kong.
Sai-Yin CheungDepartment of Pathology, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong.
Ka-Ho SheaDepartment of Pathology, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong.
Gary M TseDepartment of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Ngan Shing Street, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong.
Chinese University of Hong Kong · CNKwong Wah Hospital · CNTuen Mun Hospital · CNPrince of Wales Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The latest World Health Organization (WHO) classification categorized invasive breast carcinomas (IBCs) with neuroendocrine (NE) differentiations into neuroendocrine neoplasms (including well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor [NET] and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma [NEC]) and IBC no special type with NE features (IBC-NST-NE). However, little is documented of the clinical significance of this classification; also the precise thresholds and choices of NE markers were variable. In the current study, a large cohort of patients with IBC with NE differentiation were morphologically classified based on the WHO criteria and the clinical relevance of expression of different NE markers (synaptophysin [SYN], chromogranin [CG], and CD56) was evaluated. Among 1,372 IBCs, 52 NET (3.8%) and 172 IBC-NST-NE (12.5%) were identified. Compared with the IBC-no NE cases, NET and IBC-NST-NE were similarly associated with positive estrogen receptor (ER) expression and lower grade (p < .001). For patient outcome, IBC-NST-NE, but not NET, demonstrated significantly worse survival than the IBC-no NE cases. Based on high (≥50%) and low (<50%) expression for each NE marker, independent poor disease-free survival for SYN

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, NeuroendocrineBiomarkers, TumorChromogranin AFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorChromogranin ABreast cancerCD56ChromograninNeuroendocrine differentiationSynpatophysin

Identifiers

PMID32472950
PMCPMC7485343
OpenAlexW3030855916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.