Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32472741›Full record

SynthesisHuman brain mapping2020

Mapping the artistic brain: Common and distinct neural activations associated with musical, drawing, and literary creativity.

Qunlin Chen, Roger E Beaty, Jiang Qiu

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Human brain mapping, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Creativity in Music: The Brain Dynamics of Jazz Improvisation.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Creativity in verbal associations is linked to semantic control.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Qunlin ChenSchool of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Roger E BeatyDepartment of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jiang QiuSchool of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0269-5910
Pennsylvania State University · USMinistry of Education of the People's Republic of China · CN

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2017M622935Chongqing Special Postdoctoral Science Foundation XmT2018097Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities SWU1609177Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities SWU1809211National Natural Science Foundation of China NSFC 31600878National Natural Science Foundation of China NSFC 31771231National Natural Science Foundation of China NSFC 31800919Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing cstc2015jcyjA10106US National Science Foundation DRL-1920653
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whether creativity is a domain-general or domain-specific ability has been a topic of intense speculation. Although previous studies have examined domain-specific mechanisms of creative performance, little is known about commonalities and distinctions in neural correlates across different domains. We applied activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis to identify the brain activation of domain-mechanisms by synthesizing functional neuroimaging studies across three forms of artistic creativity: music improvisation, drawing, and literary creativity. ALE meta-analysis yielded a domain-general pattern across three artistic forms, with overlapping clusters in the presupplementary motor area (pre-SMA), left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG). Regarding domain-specificity, musical creativity was associated with recruitment of the SMA-proper, bilateral IFG, left precentral gyrus, and left middle frontal gyrus (MFG) compared to the other two artistic forms; drawing creativity recruited the left fusiform gyrus, left precuneus, right parahippocampal gyrus, and right MFG compared to musical creativity; and literary creativity recruited the left angular gyrus and right lingual gyrus compared to musical creativity. Contrasting drawing and literary creativity revealed no significant differences in neural activation, suggesting that these domains may rely on a common neurocognitive system. Overall, these findings reveal a central, domain-general system for artistic creativity, but with each domain relying to some degree on domain-specific neural circuits.

Indexed as

Brain MappingCreativityAdultArtCerebral CortexHumansLiteratureMusicNerve Netactivation likelihood estimationartistic creativityliterary creativitymusical improvisationvisual art

Identifiers

PMID32472741
PMCPMC7375056
OpenAlexW3031483904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.