Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32472708›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association2020

Quality of Life and Impact of Cancer: Differences in Rural and Nonrural Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Survivors.

Devon Noonan, Matthew LeBlanc, Cherie Conley, Habtamu Benecha, Ashley Leak-Bryant, Kellen Peter, Sheryl Zimmerman, Deborah Mayer, Sophia Smith

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Understanding the factors influencing quality of life among survivors of Non-Hodgkin lymphoma after completing primary treatment: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Social Determinants of Cancer Disparities.Annals of surgical oncology · 2023
    Review
  9. Similarities and differences across the underlying dimensions of social functioning in rural and nonrural cancer survivors: A mixed-methods study.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Acceptance of disability, coping style, perceived social support and quality of life among patients with chronic lymphedema: a cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Devon NoonanCancer Control and Populations Sciences, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6675-8736
Matthew LeBlancCancer Control and Populations Sciences, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Cherie ConleyCancer Control and Populations Sciences, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Habtamu BenechaFormerly at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Biostatistics, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Ashley Leak-BryantSchool of Nursing, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Kellen PeterCancer Control and Populations Sciences, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Sheryl ZimmermanCecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Deborah MayerSchool of Nursing, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Sophia SmithCancer Control and Populations Sciences, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Duke Medical Center · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Cancer Training GrantR25CA116339 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BASCH, ETHAN M., REEVE, BRYCE B · 2008 to 2017
$4.0M
Cancer Care Quality Training ProgramT32CA116339 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ETHAN M. BASCH, Stephanie Brooke Wheeler · 2018 to 2026
$3.0M
Quality of Life of Older Long-term Lymphoma SurvivorsR03CA101492 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SMITH, SOPHIA K · 2004 to 2005
$142k
American Cancer Society DSW-0321301NCI NIH HHS CA101492NCI NIH HHS Cancer Care Quality CA116339NCI NIH HHS R03 CA101492NCI NIH HHS R25 CA116339NCI NIH HHS T32 CA116339UNC Research Council and Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute: 10KR71019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePeople living in rural areas experience greater health disparities than their nonrural counterparts, but little is known about the association between rural status and quality of life (QOL) in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) survivors. We compared self-reported quality of life and impact of cancer in rural and nonrural NHL survivors.

methodsThis study is a secondary analysis of 566 NHL cancer survivors recruited from cancer registries at 2 large academic medical centers in 1 state. Standardized measures collected information on demographics and clinical characteristics, quality of life (QOL; SF-36), and the Impact of Cancer (IOCv2). Rural residence was determined by Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) codes designated as nonmetropolitan. Multiple linear regression analysis, adjusted for demographic and clinical covariates, was used to evaluate the relationship between rural residence and QOL and impact of cancer.

findingsAmong the 566 participants (83% response rate), rural residence was independently associated with lower SF-36 physical component summary scores and the physical function subscale (all P < .05). Rural residence was also associated with higher IOCv2 positive impact scores and the subscales of altruism/empathy and meaning of cancer scores in the adjusted models (all P < .05).

conclusionsGiven documented rural cancer disparities and the lack of resources in rural communities, study findings support the continued need to provide supportive care to rural cancer survivors to improve their QOL. Consistent with previous research, rural residence status is associated with increased positive impact following cancer diagnosis.

Indexed as

Lymphoma, Non-HodgkinNeoplasmsHumansQuality of LifeRural PopulationSurvivorscancernon-Hodgkin's lymphomaquality of liferural

Identifiers

PMID32472708
PMCPMC7529644
OpenAlexW3030302549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.