ArticleMedical physics2020
B
Article in Medical physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Magnetic omniconversion: Source-independent molding of magnetostatic fields.Science advances · 2026Article
- The role of diffusion-weighted MRI in biological image-guided radiation therapy: a roadmap.Physics in medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Automated Analysis for MR Coil QA.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Acceptance testing of a 0.35 T MR-Linac: procedures, QA baseline, and system limitations.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Multi-site feasibility and reproducibility study on UTE 3D phosphorous MRSI using novel rosette trajectory (PETALUTE).Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Improving fat saturation robustness in outer extremity MRI with a local shim coil insert.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Ground-truth-free deep learning approach for accelerated quantitative parameter mapping with memory efficient learning.PloS one · 2025Article
- Application and research progress of magnetic resonance proton density fat fraction in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: a comprehensive review.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Review
- Ultrahigh-field animal MRI system with advanced technological update.Npj imaging · 2024Article
- Characterization of spatial integrity with active and passive implants in a low-field magnetic resonance linear accelerator scanner.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Commissioning and implementing a Quality Assurance program for dedicated radiation oncology MRI scanners.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
- Abdominal synthetic CT generation for MR-only radiotherapy using structure-conserving loss and transformer-based cycle-GAN.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Usability of magnetic resonance images acquired at a novel low-field 0.55 T scanner for brain radiotherapy treatment planning.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2023Article
- Characterizing geometric distortions of 3D sequences in clinical head MRI.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2022Article
- An evaluation of quality assurance guidelines comparing the American College of Radiology and American Association of Physicists in Medicine task group 284 for magnetic resonance simulation.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022Article
- Patient specific distortion detection and mitigation in MR images used for stereotactic radiosurgery.Physics in medicine and biology · 2022Article
- Clinical assessment of geometric distortion for a 0.35T MR-guided radiotherapy system.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2021Article
- Task group 284 report: magnetic resonance imaging simulation in radiotherapy: considerations for clinical implementation, optimization, and quality assurance.Medical physics · 2021Article
- Effects of BMedical physics · 2021Article
- Clinical workflow for treating patients with a metallic hip prosthesis using magnetic resonance imaging-guided radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe purpose is: (a) Relate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) quality recommendations for radiation therapy (RT) to B
methodsMagnetic resonance imaging quality recommendations for spatial integrity, image blurring, fat saturation, and null banding in RT were developed based on the literature. Guaranteed (maximum) and typical B
resultsFor a 40 cm DSV, the B
conclusionsThe delineation of the diseased lesion from organs at risk is the main priority for RT. Therefore, field homogeneity performance for RT must minimize image blurring and image artifacts (null bands and signal dephasing) while optimizing spatial integrity and fat saturation. Based on the specifications and recommendations for field homogeneity, some MRI systems are not well suited to meet the strict demands of RT particularly for the large imaging volumes used in body MRI. VRMS and SD measurements of B
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.