ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020
Review: recent developments of substrates for nitrogen and phosphorus removal in CWs treating municipal wastewater.
Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experimental study on phosphorus removal performance from water by SW-ceramsite in a fixed-bed column.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Exploring Wetland Microbial Communities and Processes for Enhanced Wastewater Treatment: Bibliometric Review.Indian journal of microbiology · 2025Review
- The impact of biochar and activated carbon on the purification efficiency of two wetland systems under varying pollution loads.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Optimization of nutrient removal performance of magnesia-containing constructed wetlands: a microcosm study.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- Removal of phosphorus and ammonium from municipal wastewater treatment plant effluent by manganese ore in a simulated constructed wetland.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- Higher nitrogen removal achieved in constructed wetland with polyethylene fillers and NaOH-heating pre-treated corn stalks for advanced treatment of low C/N sewage.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- Removal of ammonia nitrogen from water by mesoporous carbon electrode-based membrane capacitance deionization.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Substrates are the main factor influencing the performance of constructed wetlands (CWs), and especially play an important role in enhancing the removal of nitrogen and phosphorus from CWs. In the recent 10 years, based on the investigation of emerged substrates used in CWs, this paper summarizes the removal efficiency and mechanism of nitrogen and phosphorus by a single substrate in detail. The simultaneous removal efficiency of nitrogen and phosphorus by different combined substrates is emphatically analyzed. Among them, the reuse of industrial and agricultural wastes as water treatment substrates is recommended due to the efficient pollutant removal efficiency and the principle of waste minimization, also more studies on the environmental impact and risk assessment of the application, and the subsequent disposal of saturated substrates are needed. This work serves as a basis for future screening and development of substrates utilized in CWs, which is helpful to enhance the synchronous removal of nitrogen and phosphorus, as well as improve the sustainability of substrates and CWs. Moreover, further studies on the interaction between different types of substrates in the wetland system are desperately needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32472508What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.