ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2020
Literacy assessment of preimplantation genetic patient education materials exceed national reading levels.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06018454 (Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (PGT-A) Counseling for Patients Undergoing in Vitro Fertilization (IVF)
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing in sickle cell disease: insights from a single-center experience.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- A health literate evaluation of a reproductive health education program for young men with sickle cell disease.Journal of communication in healthcare · 2026Article
- Experiences of family building counseling and perceptions of reproductive technology among adults with sickle cell disease.PloS one · 2026Article
- Clinical exome sequencing for carrier screening in assisted reproductive technology and sperm donation.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Exploring nursing care needs and the role of sleep quality in women undergoing infertility treatment: implications for personalized nursing interventions.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Expecting more: the case for incorporating fertility services into comprehensive sickle cell disease care.The Lancet. Haematology · 2023Review
- Knowledge of fertility and perception of fertility treatment among adults with sickle cell disease (KNOW FERTILITY).Frontiers in global women's health · 2023Article
- Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: challenges in clinical practice.Human genomics · 2022Review
- Go the Distance: Reproductive Health Care for People with Sickle Cell Disease.Hematology/oncology clinics of North America · 2022Review
- Some Psychometric Properties of the Brazilian CDC Clear Communication Index.Health literacy research and practice · 2022Article
- Acceptable, hopeful, and useful: development and mixed-method evaluation of an educational tool about reproductive options for people with sickle cell disease or trait.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2022Article
- Knowledge gaps in reproductive and sexual health in girls and women with sickle cell disease.British journal of haematology · 2021Review
- A health literacy analysis of the consumer-oriented COVID-19 information produced by ten state health departments.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2021Article
- Development of an Assessment Tool for YouTube Videos With Medical Content: A Focus on Nutrition and Cancer.Integrative cancer therapiesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIn vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic testing (IVF+PGT-M) reduces the risk of having a child affected by a heritable condition, yet only one-third of eligible patients are aware of this reproductive option. Access to education materials written at appropriate literacy levels could raise patients' awareness, but there is a mismatch between patient reading ability and the literacy demand of most materials. This study aimed to systematically identify written education materials on IVF+PGT-M and evaluate their literacy levels. We hypothesized that materials would fail to meet standards set by the Joint Commission and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
methodsTo identify patient education materials about IVF+PGT-M from academic databases and public-facing sources, an environmental scan was performed. Materials were analyzed using three validated scales: Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool, and Clear Communication Index.
resultsSeventeen patient education materials about IVF+PGT-M were identified from patient education databases, a consumer search engine, and professional organizations. The median reading level was 14.5 grade, median understandability was 74.2%, and median comprehensibility was 73.3%.
conclusionsFor most American adults, materials about IVF+PGT-M are not readable, understandable, or clear. The Joint Commission requires patient education materials be written at or below 5th grade reading level and the CDC recommends a 90% minimum score for comprehensibility. No evaluated material met these guidelines. Patient education materials that exceed average American literacy skills may perpetuate disparities in the utilization of IVF+PGT-M. Materials that communicate this complicated subject at an understandable level are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.