Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32472448›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2020

Literacy assessment of preimplantation genetic patient education materials exceed national reading levels.

Macy L Early, Priyanka Kumar, Arik V Marcell, Cathleen Lawson, Mindy Christianson, Lydia H Pecker

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06018454 (Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06018454 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (PGT-A) Counseling for Patients Undergoing in Vitro Fertilization (IVF)

TypeinterventionalSponsorEyup Hakan DuranRan2022 to 2024Enrolled213ConditionsPatient EducationArmsHandout on PGT-A, Handout on PGT-A and genetic counseling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Go the Distance: Reproductive Health Care for People with Sickle Cell Disease.Hematology/oncology clinics of North America · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Macy L EarlyJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. Mearly4@jhmi.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2742-1617
Priyanka KumarJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Arik V MarcellJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9873-478X
Cathleen LawsonJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4162-9852
Mindy ChristiansonJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6749-2773
Lydia H PeckerJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8371-9752

Funding

OVARIAN RESERVE IN POST-MENARCHAL FEMALES WITH SICKLE CELL ANEMIAK23HL146841 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI PECKER, LYDIA · 2020 to 2024
$1.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL146841
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic testing (IVF+PGT-M) reduces the risk of having a child affected by a heritable condition, yet only one-third of eligible patients are aware of this reproductive option. Access to education materials written at appropriate literacy levels could raise patients' awareness, but there is a mismatch between patient reading ability and the literacy demand of most materials. This study aimed to systematically identify written education materials on IVF+PGT-M and evaluate their literacy levels. We hypothesized that materials would fail to meet standards set by the Joint Commission and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

methodsTo identify patient education materials about IVF+PGT-M from academic databases and public-facing sources, an environmental scan was performed. Materials were analyzed using three validated scales: Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool, and Clear Communication Index.

resultsSeventeen patient education materials about IVF+PGT-M were identified from patient education databases, a consumer search engine, and professional organizations. The median reading level was 14.5 grade, median understandability was 74.2%, and median comprehensibility was 73.3%.

conclusionsFor most American adults, materials about IVF+PGT-M are not readable, understandable, or clear. The Joint Commission requires patient education materials be written at or below 5th grade reading level and the CDC recommends a 90% minimum score for comprehensibility. No evaluated material met these guidelines. Patient education materials that exceed average American literacy skills may perpetuate disparities in the utilization of IVF+PGT-M. Materials that communicate this complicated subject at an understandable level are needed.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingAdultEmbryo TransferFamilyFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansInternetLiteracyPatient Education as TopicPregnancyPreimplantation DiagnosisReadingUnited StatesEnvironmental scanLiteracy demandPatient educationPreimplantation genetic testingSickle cell disease

Identifiers

PMID32472448
PMCPMC7468013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.