Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32472446›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2020

A two-stage approach towards protein secondary structure classification.

Kushal Kanti Ghosh, Soulib Ghosh, Sagnik Sen, Ram Sarkar, Ujjwal Maulik

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kushal Kanti GhoshDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India. kushalkanti1999@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0929-5928
Soulib GhoshDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6458-8681
Sagnik SenDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India.
Ram SarkarDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8813-4086
Ujjwal MaulikDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India.
Jadavpur University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein secondary structure (PSS) describes the local folded structures which get formed inside a polypeptide due to interactions among atoms of the backbone. Generally, globular proteins are divided into four classes, namely all-α, all-β, α + β, and α/β. As nearly 90% of proteins fall into the said four classes, these are mostly considered for the purpose of computational classification of proteins. Classification of PSS is important for different biological functions that include protein fold recognition, tertiary structure prediction, prediction of DNA-binding sites, and reduction of the conformation search space among others. In this paper, we have proposed a machine learning-based model for secondary structure classification of proteins into four classes: all-α, all-β, α + β, and α/β. In doing so, we have considered both sequence-based and structure-based features. At first, mutual information (MI), a filter-based feature selection method, is used to remove the redundant features, and then these selected features are used to train three different classifiers-random forest, K-nearest neighbor (KNN), and multi-layer perceptron (MLP). After that, some standard classifier combination approaches are applied to integrate the decision made by the said classifiers and it has been found that weighted product rule performs the best among all. The overall accuracies obtained using the proposed model on the four standard datasets, namely 640, 1189, 25pdb, and fc699 are 86.89%, 92.93%, 91.38%, and 94.87% respectively. The proposed model outperforms some state-of-the-art methods considered here for comparison. Significantly high classification accuracy produced by our proposed model on four datasets is attributed to the development of a comprehensive feature set (by eliminating redundant features through feature selection technique) which is then passed through an ensemble consists of three different classifiers. Assigning different weights to the outcome of different classifiers thus proved to be useful in designing the model for predicting the secondary structure of proteins based on its sequence-based and structure-based features. Graphical abstract.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerPeptidesProteinsProtein Structure, SecondaryPeptidesProteinsClassifier combinationFeature selectionProteinProtein sequenceSecondary structure

Identifiers

PMID32472446
OpenAlexW3031101651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.