Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32472427›Full record

SynthesisLasers in medical science2020

Efficacy, safety, and guidelines of application of the fractional ablative laser erbium YAG 2940 nm and non-ablative laser erbium glass in rejuvenation, skin spots, and acne in different skin phototypes: a systematic review.

Débora Aparecida Oliveira Modena, Ana Carolina Godoy Miranda, Clovis Grecco, Richard Eloin Liebano, Raquel Cristina Tancsik Cordeiro, Renata Michelini Guidi

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Lasers in medical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Advances in the treatment of acne scars.Frontiers in medicine · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Débora Aparecida Oliveira ModenaDepartment of Surgery, Medical Sciences Institute, University of Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. de_modena@yahoo.com.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2800-3620
Ana Carolina Godoy MirandaDepartment of Research, Development and Innovation of Ibramed, Study Group in Applied Technologies for Health, Amparo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Clovis GreccoDepartment of Research, Development and Innovation of Ibramed, Study Group in Applied Technologies for Health, Amparo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Richard Eloin LiebanoDepartment of Research, Development and Innovation of Ibramed, Study Group in Applied Technologies for Health, Amparo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Raquel Cristina Tancsik CordeiroThe Specialized Ambulatory of Cosmiatry, University of Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Renata Michelini GuidiDepartment of Research, Development and Innovation of Ibramed, Study Group in Applied Technologies for Health, Amparo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRInstituto Brasileiro de Museus · BRUniversidade Federal de São Carlos · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-ablative and ablative fractional erbium lasers are among the most frequently used resources in dermatology for facial rejuvenation and for treating dermatological disorders. This type of erbium laser can be found at wavelengths of 1540 or 1550 nm, which are classified as non-ablative erbium glass, and at 2940 nm, classified as ablative erbium YAG. Despite the reports of their clinical benefits, few scientific studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of these lasers in the short or long term. In order to substantiate the effects, benefits, and safety of applying the erbium glass and erbium YAG lasers, a systematic review was carried out from August to December 2019 about studies published in the last 20 years. Randomized clinical trials in humans were considered that evaluated the efficacy, safety, and benefits of applying the fractional lasers erbium glass and erbium YAG to facial rejuvenation, skin spots, and atrophic acne scars. A total of 338 articles were identified; 76 articles remained after their titles and abstracts were read, and 42 articles were selected after removing the duplicates. After the articles were read in full, 17 of these articles were included in the systematic review (453 patients). The erbium glass and erbium YAG lasers seem promising in the short term, with minimal adverse effects; however, the long-term efficacy and safety still present limitations. Consequently, future research is needed, with better methodological standardization and a follow-up with a longer evaluation period for possible permanent adverse effects to determine the standardization and safety of therapy with erbium glass and erbium YAG lasers.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicRejuvenationAcne VulgarisCicatrixFemaleHumansLasers, Solid-StateMaleSkinSkin AgingTreatment OutcomeAcneAging skinErbium glassErbium YAGMelanosesRejuvenationSpots

Identifiers

PMID32472427
OpenAlexW3029489433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.