Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32472254›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2021

Mapping the microbiological diversity of odontogenic abscess: are we using the right drugs?

Nils Heim, Benedict Jürgensen, Franz-Josef Kramer, Valentin Wiedemeyer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nils HeimDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg Campus 1, Haus 11, 2. OG, D-53127, Bonn, Germany. nils.heim@web.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5220-5046
Benedict JürgensenDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg Campus 1, Haus 11, 2. OG, D-53127, Bonn, Germany.
Franz-Josef KramerDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg Campus 1, Haus 11, 2. OG, D-53127, Bonn, Germany.
Valentin WiedemeyerDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg Campus 1, Haus 11, 2. OG, D-53127, Bonn, Germany.
University Hospital Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was categorizing the microbial flora and susceptibility to antibiotics and to clarify to which degree the empiric administered antibiotics are suitable for therapy. MATERIALS AND

methodsA 3.5-year retrospective study evaluated hospital records of 206 patients who suffered from head and neck infections of odontogenic origin. All patients underwent surgical incision and drainage and received intravenous antibiotics and inpatient treatment. The specimens were obtained by performing a swab.

resultsTwo hundred six patients were included with 251 strains isolated (1.22 per patient). One hundred eight strains showed antibiotic resistance. Eighty-seven patients showed at least one bacterial strain that showed antibiotic resistance (42.2%). The most frequent isolated bacteria were Streptococcus spp. (n = 116), with a high rate of antibiotic resistance (50.8%). We investigated 205 cases of antibiotic resistance in 87 subjects. Nine bacterial strains showed no susceptibility to unacid (4.3%) and 36 strains to clindamycin (17.5%).

conclusionAntibiotic resistance against clindamycin was rather high. The distribution of the afflicted spaces and isolated bacteria was alike recent findings. It is mandatory to understand that immediate surgical treatment in terms of incision and drainage is the basis in abscess treatment. Antibiotic treatment is adjunct therapy. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Streptococcus species were the most frequently identified bacteria presenting antibiotic resistance in more than 50%. Increased resistant rates for clindamycin require reconsiderations regarding an empiric antibiotic treatment.

Indexed as

AbscessPharmaceutical PreparationsAnti-Bacterial AgentsClindamycinHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsClindamycinPharmaceutical PreparationsAntibiotic resistanceDeep head and neck infectionOdontogenic abscess

Identifiers

PMID32472254
OpenAlexW3032286577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.