ArticleDer Urologe. Ausg. A2020
[Aphallia - report of two cases].
Article in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- A rare case report of aphallia with hypoplastic kidney and vesicorectal fistula.Radiology case reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aphallia is an extremely rare congenital malformation of unknown cause. The incidence is reported in the literature to be 1 in 10-30 million live births. Almost 100 cases have been described to date. Aphallia is associated with other congenital malformations (in particular urogenital and gastrointestinal anomalies) in >50% of cases. The diagnosis is made clinically and shows the complete absence of the corpora cavernosa and the corpus spongiosum with a urethral opening along the perineal midline (most frequently ventral to the anus and in the ventral rectal wall). Two case reports from the authors' department: The first child was a male newborn (46,XY) with penis agenesis and additional bilateral intraabdominal testis, an anorectal malformation (ARM) with a rectovesical fistula, as well as left renal duplication and grade III vesico-ureteral reflux on the right side. The second child was a male newborn (46,XY) with aphallia without further urological or anorectal malformation. Only right inguinal hernia was present. In the first patient, several corrective surgeries were performed in the further course in view of the additional malformations. With regard to the aphallia, the various temporary treatment options (scrotal or parascrotal phalloplasty or penis prosthesis) were discussed with the parents. Masculinizing surgery by means of definitive phalloplasty was planned once the patient has reached puberty. Due to the technical demands of phallus reconstruction, feminization is still favored in some countries in the literature, which nowadays, however, cannot be justified medically or legally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.