ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2020
Recent Advances in T1 and T2 Mapping in the Assessment of Fulminant Myocarditis by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Understanding immune checkpoint inhibitors-related myocarditis: Mechanisms and targeted therapeutic pathways.Theranostics · 2026Review
- Article
- Recent Progress of Cardiac MRI for Nuclear Medicine Professionals.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Review
- Cardiovascular Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guideline of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology and the Brazilian College of Radiology - 2024.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2024Article
- Diagnostic criteria for myocarditis on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: an educational review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023Article
- Comprehensive Cardiac Magnetic Resonance to Detect Subacute Myocarditis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Parametric Mapping Techniques: Clinical Applications and Limitations.Current cardiology reports · 2021Review
- Role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and management of COVID-19 related myocarditis: Clinical and imaging considerations.World journal of radiology · 2021Review
- Multiparametric MRI of early tumor response to immune checkpoint blockade in metastatic melanoma.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2021Article
- A novel coronavirus meets the cardiovascular system: Society for Cardiovascular Pathology Symposium 2021.Cardiovascular pathology : the official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular PathologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review was undertaken to summarise recent data relating to T1 and T2 relaxation times in the assessment of myocarditis using cardiac MRI, and the effect new studies have had on the established diagnostic criteria, leading to recently proposed revised criteria for the cardiac MRI assessment of myocarditis. RECENT
findingsIn 2018, updates to the 2009 Lake Louise Criteria (LLC) were proposed, based on studies showing improved accuracy of T1 mapping techniques over T1 signal intensity ratio-based imaging, although for the detection of myocardial oedema either T2-weighted images or increased T2 relaxation times can be used. Non-ischaemic distribution of scar on late gadolinium-enhanced (LGE) T1-weighted imaging remains in the newly revised criteria, which, although can have low sensitivity due to fibrosis presenting diffusely or due to CMR being performed early in the disease process before scar formation, remains in the LLC due to its high specificity. Early gadolinium enhancement has been removed from the LLC, as T1 quantification has higher diagnostic accuracy for the detection of myocardial injury. In the CMR assessment of myocarditis, T1 and T2 quantifications are now recommended over T1- and T2-weighted imaging. Late gadolinium enhancement in a non-ischaemic pattern remains in the updated criteria, whereas early gadolinium enhancement has been superseded by T1 quantification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.