Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32472189›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2020

Artificial Intelligence in Intracoronary Imaging.

Russell Fedewa, Rishi Puri, Eitan Fleischman, Juhwan Lee, David Prabhu, David L Wilson, D Geoffrey Vince, Aaron Fleischman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Optical coherence tomography to guide percutaneous coronary intervention.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Vulnerable Atherosclerotic Plaque: Is There a Molecular Signature?International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Russell FedewaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Rishi PuriDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Eitan FleischmanDepartment of Internal Medicine, New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, NY, 11215, USA.
Juhwan LeeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
David PrabhuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
David L WilsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
D Geoffrey VinceDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Aaron FleischmanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. fleisca@ccf.org.
Cleveland Clinic · USCase Western Reserve University · USNewYork–Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital · US

Funding

Computer assisted coronary artery stent interventionsR01HL143484 · NHLBI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI BEZERRA, HIRAM, WILSON, DAVID LYNN · 2018 to 2021
$2.9M
In vivo Characterization of Stents using Intravascular OCT ImagingR01HL114406 · NHLBI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI BEZERRA, HIRAM, ROLLINS, ANDREW MARTIN · 2013 to 2016
$1.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL114406NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL143484
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis paper investigates present uses and future potential of artificial intelligence (AI) applied to intracoronary imaging technologies. RECENT

findingsAdvances in data analytics and digitized medical imaging have enabled clinical application of AI to improve patient outcomes and reduce costs through better diagnosis and enhanced workflow. Applications of AI to IVUS and IVOCT have produced improvements in image segmentation, plaque analysis, and stent evaluation. Machine learning algorithms are able to predict future coronary events through the use of imaging results, clinical evaluations, laboratory tests, and demographics. The application of AI to intracoronary imaging holds significant promise for improved understanding and treatment of coronary heart disease. Even in these early stages, AI has demonstrated the ability to improve the prediction of cardiac events. Large curated data sets and databases are needed to speed the development of AI and enable testing and comparison among algorithms.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningAlgorithmsCoronary VesselsDeep LearningHumansTomography, Optical CoherenceUltrasonography, InterventionalArtificial intelligenceDeep learningImagingIVUSMachine learningOCT

Identifiers

PMID32472189
OpenAlexW3029781328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.