ReviewJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2020
Genetic testing strategies in the newborn.
Review in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Prospective Study of Parental Perceptions of Rapid Whole-Genome and -Exome Sequencing among Seriously Ill Infants.American journal of human genetics · 2020Trial
- Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Critically Ill Neonates and Children: Diagnostic Yield and Clinical Utility.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Karyogram in neonatology: Necessity or past?Global medical genetics · 2025Article
- Transforming NICU care: rapid WES and transcriptomics-validation, social impact, and cost analysis.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Identifying characteristics associated with genetic testing in the NICU.Journal of community genetics · 2025Article
- The Greater Saphenous Venipuncture Procedure: A Reliable Phlebotomy Method for Neonates.Cureus · 2025Article
- The Approach to a Child with Dysmorphic Features: What the Pediatrician Should Know.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Challenges in the clinical understanding of genetic testing in birth defects and pediatric diseases.Translational pediatrics · 2023Review
- Genetic Testing and Hospital Length of Stay in Neonates With Epilepsy.Pediatric neurology · 2022Article
- Multicenter Consensus Approach to Evaluation of Neonatal Hypotonia in the Genomic Era: A Review.JAMA neurology · 2022Review
- Equity in Health: Consideration of Race and Ethnicity in Precision Medicine.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genetic disorders presenting in the neonatal period can have a significant impact on morbidity and mortality. Early diagnosis can facilitate timely prognostic counseling to families and possibility of precision care, which could improve outcome. As availability of diagnostic testing expands, the required knowledge base of the neonatologist must also expand to include proper application and understanding of genetic testing modalities, especially where availability of clinical genetics consultation is limited. Herein, we review genetic tests utilized in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) providing background on the technology, clinical indications, advantages, and limitations of the tests. This review will span from classic cytogenetics to the evolving role of next generation sequencing and its impact on the management of neonatal disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32472107What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.