Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32471854›Full record

Trial reportRMD open2020

Earlier is better when treating rheumatoid arthritis: but can we detect a window of opportunity?

Sytske Anne Bergstra, Joy A Van Der Pol, Naghmeh Riyazi, Yvonne P M Goekoop-Ruiterman, Pit J S M Kerstens, Willem Lems, Tom W J Huizinga, Cornelia F Allaart

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in RMD open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Pre-RA: Can early diagnosis lead to prevention?Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sytske Anne Bergstra *Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands s.a.bergstra@lumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-7136-5248
Joy A Van Der Pol *Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Naghmeh RiyaziDepartment of Rheumatology, HAGA Hospital, The Hague, Netherlands.
Yvonne P M Goekoop-RuitermanDepartment of Rheumatology, HAGA Hospital, The Hague, Netherlands.
Pit J S M KerstensRheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology & Immunology Center | Reade, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Willem LemsDepartment of Rheumatology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Tom W J HuizingaDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7033-7520
Cornelia F AllaartDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLHaga Hospital · NLAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLReade · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe window of opportunity (WOO) hypothesis suggests a limited time frame to stop rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We hypothesised that a WOO could either be represented by a hyperbolic ('curved') decline in the chance to achieve the outcome sustained drug-free remission (sDFR) over time, after which achieving sDFR is not possible anymore, or by a more gradual linear decline approaching zero chance to achieve sDFR.

methodsPatients with RA (symptom duration <2 years) were included from two randomised trials: BehandelStrategieën (BeSt), n=508 and Induction therapy with Methotrexate and Prednisone in Rheumatoid Or Very Early arthritic Disease (IMPROVED), n=479. Cox-regression was performed to assess the shape of the association between symptom duration and sDFR (Disease Activity Score<1.6, no disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs for ≥1 year) for patients starting slow-acting monotherapy (IMPROVED, BeSt) or fast-acting combination therapy (BeSt). Likelihood ratio tests were used to compare the fit of linear and non-linear models in both databases separately. Predictions from the best fitting models were used to assess whether the absolute risk to achieve sDFR approaches zero with increasing symptom duration.

resultsIn BeSt and IMPROVED, 54/226 and 110/421 patients achieved sDFR with fast-acting treatment, and 53/243 (BeSt) with slow-acting treatment. Non-linear models did not fit better than linear models (fast-acting treatment BeSt p=0.743, IMPROVED p=0.337; slow-acting treatment BeSt p=0.609). After slow-acting monotherapy, linear models declined steeper. None of the models approached zero chance to achieve sDFR over time.

conclusionsThe chance to achieve sDFR decreased gradually over time, and decreased fastest in patients starting slow-acting monotherapy. In both treatment groups, we found no evidence for a WOO within 2 years symptom duration.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidDisease ProgressionDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMaleMethotrexateMiddle AgedNetherlandsPrednisoneProportional Hazards ModelsAntirheumatic AgentsMethotrexatePrednisoneBone mineral densityCorticosteroidsDisease activityDMARDs (biologic)DMARDs (synthetic)OsteoarthritisOsteoporosisRheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID32471854
PMCPMC7299505
OpenAlexW3030673599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.