ArticleInfectious diseases of poverty2020
Psychological status and behavior changes of the public during the COVID-19 epidemic in China.
Article in Infectious diseases of poverty, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 132 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
132 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 385 citations in OpenAlex.
- Celiac disease and COVID-19 in adults: A systematic review.PloS one · 2023Pooled it
- Virtual Reality (VR) Technology for Treatment of Mental Health Problems during COVID-19: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- Prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms among Chinese older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of geriatric psychiatry and neurology · 2022Pooled it
- Efficacy and practice of facemask use in general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational psychiatry · 2022Pooled it
- Mass quarantine and mental health during COVID-19: A meta-analysis.Journal of affective disorders · 2021Pooled it
- Prevalence of mental health problems among children and adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of affective disorders · 2021Pooled it
- Prevalence of anxiety in the COVID-19 pandemic: An updated meta-analysis of community-based studies.Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry · 2021Pooled it
- Global prevalence of mental health issues among the general population during the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2021Pooled it
- Mental Health of Children and Adolescents Amidst COVID-19 and Past Pandemics: A Rapid Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- A Systematic Review on Sex- and Gender-Sensitive Research in Public Mental Health During the First Wave of the COVID-19 Crisis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Pooled it
- The Prevalence of Psychological Status During the COVID-19 Epidemic in China: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Pooled it
- Exploring the Impact of COVID-19 on Mental Health Outcomes in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Pooled it
- Investigation of Perceived Stress During COVID-19 Pandemic Self-Isolation Periods.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Distress and coping among youth during COVID-19: a national cross sectional study in France.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Anxiety and determinants among patients with chronic diseases during pandemic of emerging infectious diseases: a moderated mediation analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Home-based physical activity and well-being during infectious diseases: a structural equation modeling study.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Health and wellbeing of staff working at higher education institutions globally during the post-COVID-19 pandemic period: evidence from a cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Mathematical Assessment of the Role of Human Behavior Changes on SARS-CoV-2 Transmission Dynamics in the United States.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
72 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA cluster of pneumonia cases were reported by Wuhan Municipal Health Commission, China in December 2019. A novel coronavirus was eventually identified, and became the COVID-19 epidemic that affected public health and life. We investigated the psychological status and behavior changes of the general public in China from January 30 to February 3, 2020.
methodsRespondents were recruited via social media (WeChat) and completed an online questionnaire. We used the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Self-rating Depression Scale, and Symptom Checklist-90 to evaluate psychological status. We also investigated respondents' behavior changes. Quantitative data were analyzed by t-tests or analysis of variance, and classified data were analyzed with chi-square tests.
resultsIn total, 608 valid questionnaires were obtained. More respondents had state anxiety than trait anxiety (15.8% vs 4.0%). Depression was found among 27.1% of respondents and 7.7% had psychological abnormalities. About 10.1% of respondents suffered from phobia. Our analysis of the relationship between subgroup characteristics and psychological status showed that age, gender, knowledge about COVID-19, degree of worry about epidemiological infection, and confidence about overcoming the outbreak significantly influenced psychological status. Around 93.3% of respondents avoided going to public places and almost all respondents reduced Spring Festival-related activities. At least 70.9% of respondents chose to take three or more preventive measures to avoid infection. The three most commonly used prevention measures were making fewer trips outside and avoiding contact (98.0%), wearing a mask (83.7%), and hand hygiene (82.4%).
conclusionsWe need to pay more attention to public psychological stress, especially among young people, as they are likely to experience anxiety, depression, and psychological abnormalities. Different psychological interventions could be formulated according to the psychological characteristics of different gender and age groups. The majority of respondents followed specific behaviors required by the authorities, but it will take time to observe the effects of these behaviors on the epidemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.