Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32471504›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2020

Self-evaluated ethical competence of a practicing physiotherapist: a national study in Finland.

Kati Kulju, Riitta Suhonen, Pauli Puukka, Anna Tolvanen, Helena Leino-Kilpi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Physiotherapy Students' Experiences about Ethical Situations Encountered in Clinical Practices.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kati KuljuDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, FI-20014, Turku, Finland. kati.kulju@utu.fi.ORCID 0000-0001-6874-5592
Riitta SuhonenDepartment of Nursing Science/ Turku University Hospital and City of Turku, Welfare Division, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-4315-5550
Pauli PuukkaNational Institute for Health and Welfare, Turku, Finland.
Anna TolvanenDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, FI-20014, Turku, Finland.
Helena Leino-KilpiDepartment of Nursing Science, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-2477-971X

Funding

Finnish Association of Physiotherapists -
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients have the right to equal, respectful treatment. Nowadays, one third of patient complaints concern health care staff's behavior towards patients. Ethically safe care requires ethical competence, which has been addressed as a core competence in physiotherapy. It has been defined in terms of character strength, ethical awareness, moral judgment skills in decision-making, and willingness to do good. The purpose of this study was to analyze the ethical competence of practicing physiotherapists.

methodA self-evaluation instrument (Physiotherapist's Ethical Competence Evaluation Tool) based on an analysis of a concept "ethical competence" was constructed in 2016 and physiotherapists (n = 839), working in public health services or private practice responded to the questionnaire.

resultsBased on the results, most of the physiotherapists evaluated themselves highly ethically competent in all areas of ethical competence, subscales being Strength, Awareness, Skills and Will. Willingness to do good was evaluated as highest, while character strength, including the strength to support ethical processes and speak on behalf of the patient, was evaluated the lowest. Physiotherapists most commonly consult a colleague when encountering an ethical problem. Other methods for problem solving are not very familiar, neither are the international or national ethical codes of conduct.

conclusionsThis was the first attempt to assess all aspects of ethical competence empirically in a clinical environment in physiotherapy, using a novel self-evaluation instrument. Even if physiotherapists evaluate themselves as competent in ethics, further exploration is needed for ethical awareness. Also the patients' viewpoints about ethically competent care should be considered, to better ensure ethical safety of the patient.

Indexed as

Physical TherapistsClinical CompetenceCodes of EthicsFinlandHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesCharacter strengthEthical awarenessEthical competencePECETPhysiotherapySelf-evaluation

Identifiers

PMID32471504
PMCPMC7257238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.