ArticleDiagnostic pathology2020
Automated quantitative analysis of Ki-67 staining and HE images recognition and registration based on whole tissue sections in breast carcinoma.
Article in Diagnostic pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ozonated Water Modulates Cell Proliferation and Vascular Density in Solid Ehrlich Tumor of Mice.Cancers · 2026Article
- Emerging non-invasive imaging biomarkers of Ki-67 in pancreatic cancer: Toward predictive precision oncology.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Automated interpretation of PD-L1 CPS based on multi-AI models integration strategy in gastric cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Ki-67 as a Marker to Differentiate Burkitt Lymphoma and Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma: A Literature Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- Revolutionizing breast cancer Ki-67 diagnosis: ultrasound radiomics and fully connected neural networks (FCNN) combination method.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2024Article
- Quantitative immunohistochemistry analysis of breast Ki67 based on artificial intelligence.Open life sciences · 2024Article
- Review
- AI-Powered Segmentation of Invasive Carcinoma Regions in Breast Cancer Immunohistochemical Whole-Slide Images.Cancers · 2023Article
- Ki67 proliferation index in medullary thyroid carcinoma: a comparative study of multiple counting methods and validation of image analysis and deep learning platforms.Histopathology · 2023Article
- Predictive Value of KJournal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2023Article
- The Evolution of Ki-67 and Breast Carcinoma: Past Observations, Present Directions, and Future Considerations.Cancers · 2023Review
- Use of Novel Open-Source Deep Learning Platform for Quantification of Ki-67 in Neuroendocrine Tumors - Analytical Validation.International journal of general medicine · 2023Article
- Application of Deep Learning in Histopathology Images of Breast Cancer: A Review.Micromachines · 2022Review
- Artificial intelligence scale-invariant feature transform algorithm-based system to improve the calculation accuracy of Ki-67 index in invasive breast cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
- Texture Analysis of Enhanced MRI and Pathological Slides Predicts EGFR Mutation Status in Breast Cancer.BioMed research international · 2022Article
- Machine learning-based image analysis for accelerating the diagnosis of complicated preneoplastic and neoplastic ductal lesions in breast biopsy tissues.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2021Article
- [Application Test of the AI-Automatic Diagnostic System for Ki-67 in Breast Cancer].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2021Article
- Visual Counting and Automated Image-analytic Assessment of Ki-67 and their Prognostic Value in Synovial Sarcoma.Cancer diagnosis & prognosisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe scoring of Ki-67 is highly relevant for the diagnosis, classification, prognosis, and treatment in breast invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Traditional scoring method of Ki-67 staining followed by manual counting, is time-consumption and inter-/intra observer variability, which may limit its clinical value. Although more and more algorithms and individual platforms have been developed for the assessment of Ki-67 stained images to improve its accuracy level, most of them lack of accurate registration of immunohistochemical (IHC) images and their matched hematoxylin-eosin (HE) images, or did not accurately labelled each positive and negative cell with Ki-67 staining based on whole tissue sections (WTS). In view of this, we introduce an accurate image registration method and an automatic identification and counting software of Ki-67 based on WTS by deep learning.
methodsWe marked 1017 breast IDC whole slide imaging (WSI), established a research workflow based on the (i) identification of IDC area, (ii) registration of HE and IHC slides from the same anatomical region, and (iii) counting of positive Ki-67 staining.
resultsThe accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity levels of identifying breast IDC regions were 89.44, 85.05, and 95.23%, respectively, and the contiguous HE and Ki-67 stained slides perfectly registered. We counted and labelled each cell of 10 Ki-67 slides as standard for testing on WTS, the accuracy by automatic calculation of Ki-67 positive rate in attained IDC was 90.2%. In the human-machine competition of Ki-67 scoring, the average time of 1 slide was 2.3 min with 1 GPU by using this software, and the accuracy was 99.4%, which was over 90% of the results provided by participating doctors.
conclusionsOur study demonstrates the enormous potential of automated quantitative analysis of Ki-67 staining and HE images recognition and registration based on WTS, and the automated scoring of Ki67 can thus successfully address issues of consistency, reproducibility and accuracy. We will provide those labelled images as an open-free platform for researchers to assess the performance of computer algorithms for automated Ki-67 scoring on IHC stained slides.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.