Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32471460›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2020

Changing role of EMS -analyses of non-conveyed and conveyed patients in Finland.

Jani Paulin, Jouni Kurola, Sanna Salanterä, Hans Moen, Nischal Guragain, Mari Koivisto, Niina Käyhkö, Venla Aaltonen, Timo Iirola

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. "I just needed help": a qualitative study of patients' experiences with a single responder ambulance.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jani PaulinFinnHEMS Research and Development Unit, FinnHEMS Ltd, Vantaa, Finland. jani.paulin@utu.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4038-3662
Jouni KurolaCentre for Prehospital Emergency Care, Kuopio University Hospital and University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Sanna SalanteräDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Hans MoenDepartment of Future Technologies, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Nischal GuragainDepartment of Future Technologies, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Mari KoivistoDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Niina KäyhköDepartment of Geography and Geology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Venla AaltonenDepartment of Geography and Geology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Timo IirolaEmergency Medical Services, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

Funding

Academy of Finland 315376
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergency Medical Services (EMS) and Emergency Departments (ED) have seen increasing attendance rates in the last decades. Currently, EMS are increasingly assessing and treating patients without the need to convey patients to health care facility. The aim of this study was to describe and compare the patient case-mix between conveyed and non-conveyed patients and to analyze factors related to non-conveyance decision making.

methodsThis was a prospective study design of EMS patients in Finland, and data was collected between 1st June and 30th November 2018. Adjusted ICPC2-classification was used as the reason for care. NEWS2-points were collected and analyzed both statistically and with a semi-supervised information extraction method. EMS patients' geographic location and distance to health care facilities were analyzed by urban-rural classification.

resultsOf the EMS patients (40,263), 59.8% were over 65 years of age and 46.0% of the patients had zero NEWS2 points. The most common ICPC2 code was weakness/tiredness, general (A04), as seen in 13.5% of all patients. When comparing patients between the non-conveyance and conveyance group, a total of 35,454 EMS patients met the inclusion criteria and 14,874 patients (42.0%) were not conveyed to health care facilities. According the multivariable logistic regression model, the non-conveyance decision was more likely made by ALS units, when the EMS arrival time was in the evening or night and when the distance to the health care facility was 21-40 km. Furthermore, younger patients, female gender, whether the patient had used alcohol and a rural area were also related to the non-conveyance decision. If the patient's NEWS2 score increased by one or two points, the likelihood of conveyance increased. When there was less than 1 h to complete a shift, this did not associate with either non-conveyance or conveyance decisions.

conclusionsThe role of EMS might be changing. This warrants to redesign the chain-of-survival in EMS to include not only high-risk patient groups but also non-critical and general acute patients with non-specific reasons for care. Assessment and on-scene treatment without conveyance can be called the "stretched arm of the emergency department", but should be planned carefully to ensure patient safety.

Indexed as

Decision MakingRural PopulationAgedAged, 80 and overEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleFinlandHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SafetyProspective StudiesConveyanceEmergency medical services [MeSH]Non-conveyance

Identifiers

PMID32471460
PMCPMC7260794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.