Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32471448›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2020

Functional insights from the GC-poor genomes of two aphid parasitoids, Aphidius ervi and Lysiphlebus fabarum.

Alice B Dennis, Gabriel I Ballesteros, Stéphanie Robin, Lukas Schrader, Jens Bast, Jan Berghöfer, Leo W Beukeboom, Maya Belghazi, Anthony Bretaudeau, Jan Buellesbach and 30 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Whole genome sequence of a long-legged flyFrontiers in genetics · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Insects · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

40 authors at 14 institutions in 7 countries.

Alice B DennisDepartment of Aquatic Ecology, Eawag, 8600, Dübendorf, Switzerland. alicebdennis@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0948-9845
Gabriel I BallesterosInstituto de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de Talca, Talca, Chile.
Stéphanie RobinIGEPP, Agrocampus Ouest, INRAE, Université de Rennes, 35650, Le Rheu, France.
Lukas SchraderInstitute for Evolution and Biodiversity, Universität Münster, Münster, Germany.
Jens BastDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, Université de Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jan BerghöferInstitute for Evolution and Biodiversity, Universität Münster, Münster, Germany.
Leo W BeukeboomGroningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Maya BelghaziAix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, INP, Inst Neurophysiopathol, PINT, PFNT, Marseille, France.
Anthony BretaudeauIGEPP, Agrocampus Ouest, INRAE, Université de Rennes, 35650, Le Rheu, France.
Jan BuellesbachInstitute for Evolution and Biodiversity, Universität Münster, Münster, Germany.
Elizabeth CashDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, & Management, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Dominique ColinetUniversité Côte d'Azur, INRAE, CNRS, ISA, Sophia Antipolis, France.
Zoé DumasDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, Université de Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Mohammed ErrbiiInstitute for Evolution and Biodiversity, Universität Münster, Münster, Germany.
Patrizia FalabellaDepartment of Sciences, University of Basilicata, 85100, Potenza, Italy.
Jean-Luc GattiUniversité Côte d'Azur, INRAE, CNRS, ISA, Sophia Antipolis, France.
Elzemiek GeuverinkGroningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Joshua D GibsonDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, & Management, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Corinne HertaegDepartment of Aquatic Ecology, Eawag, 8600, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Stefanie HartmannInstitute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, 14476, Potsdam, Germany.
Emmanuelle Jacquin-JolyINRAE, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, IRD, UPEC, Université Paris Diderot, Institute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences of Paris, iEES-Paris, F-78000, Versailles, France.
Mark LammersInstitute for Evolution and Biodiversity, Universität Münster, Münster, Germany.
Blas I LavanderoLaboratorio de Control Biológico, Instituto de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de Talca, Talca, Chile.
Ina LindenbaumInstitute for Evolution and Biodiversity, Universität Münster, Münster, Germany.
Lauriane Massardier-GalataUniversité Côte d'Azur, INRAE, CNRS, ISA, Sophia Antipolis, France.
Camille MeslinINRAE, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, IRD, UPEC, Université Paris Diderot, Institute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences of Paris, iEES-Paris, F-78000, Versailles, France.
Nicolas MontagnéINRAE, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, IRD, UPEC, Université Paris Diderot, Institute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences of Paris, iEES-Paris, F-78000, Versailles, France.
Nina PakDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, & Management, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Marylène PoiriéUniversité Côte d'Azur, INRAE, CNRS, ISA, Sophia Antipolis, France.
Rosanna SalviaDepartment of Sciences, University of Basilicata, 85100, Potenza, Italy.
Chris R SmithDepartment of Biology, Earlham College, Richmond, IN, 47374, USA.
Denis TaguIGEPP, Agrocampus Ouest, INRAE, Université de Rennes, 35650, Le Rheu, France.
Sophie TaresUniversité Côte d'Azur, INRAE, CNRS, ISA, Sophia Antipolis, France.
Heiko VogelDepartment of Entomology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
Tanja SchwanderDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, Université de Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jean-Christophe SimonIGEPP, Agrocampus Ouest, INRAE, Université de Rennes, 35650, Le Rheu, France.
Christian C FigueroaInstituto de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de Talca, Talca, Chile.
Christoph VorburgerDepartment of Aquatic Ecology, Eawag, 8600, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Fabrice LegeaiIGEPP, Agrocampus Ouest, INRAE, Université de Rennes, 35650, Le Rheu, France.
Jürgen GadauInstitute for Evolution and Biodiversity, Universität Münster, Münster, Germany. gadauj@uni-muenster.de.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversity of Münster · DEUniversity of Talca · CLETH Zurich · CHInstitut Agro Rennes-Angers · FRUniversity of Basilicata · ITUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of Groningen · NLUniversity of Lausanne · CHUniversity of Potsdam · DEEarlham College · USGeorgia Southern University · USMax Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology · DEUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-11-LABX-0028-01Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 1554/3-1Deutsches Forschungsgemeinschaft GA 661/4-1Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico 1130483 and 1170943Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung PP00P3_123376Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung PP00P3_146341Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung PP00P3_170627
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParasitoid wasps have fascinating life cycles and play an important role in trophic networks, yet little is known about their genome content and function. Parasitoids that infect aphids are an important group with the potential for biological control. Their success depends on adapting to develop inside aphids and overcoming both host aphid defenses and their protective endosymbionts.

resultsWe present the de novo genome assemblies, detailed annotation, and comparative analysis of two closely related parasitoid wasps that target pest aphids: Aphidius ervi and Lysiphlebus fabarum (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Aphidiinae). The genomes are small (139 and 141 Mbp) and the most AT-rich reported thus far for any arthropod (GC content: 25.8 and 23.8%). This nucleotide bias is accompanied by skewed codon usage and is stronger in genes with adult-biased expression. AT-richness may be the consequence of reduced genome size, a near absence of DNA methylation, and energy efficiency. We identify missing desaturase genes, whose absence may underlie mimicry in the cuticular hydrocarbon profile of L. fabarum. We highlight key gene groups including those underlying venom composition, chemosensory perception, and sex determination, as well as potential losses in immune pathway genes.

conclusionsThese findings are of fundamental interest for insect evolution and biological control applications. They provide a strong foundation for further functional studies into coevolution between parasitoids and their hosts. Both genomes are available at https://bipaa.genouest.org.

Indexed as

GenomicsAnimalsAphidsDNA MethylationGC Rich SequenceInsect ProteinsSex Determination ProcessesVenomsWaspsInsect ProteinsVenomsAphid hostAphidius erviChemosensory genesde novo genome assemblyDNA methylation lossGC contentLysiphlebus fabarumParasitoid waspToll and Imd pathwaysVenom proteins

Identifiers

PMID32471448
PMCPMC7257214
OpenAlexW3025235349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.