Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32471446›Full record

Observational studyRadiation oncology (London, England)2020

Early circulating tumour DNA kinetics measured by ultra-deep next-generation sequencing during radical radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: a feasibility study.

G M Walls, L McConnell, J McAleese, P Murray, T B Lynch, K Savage, G G Hanna, D Gonzalez de Castro

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Liquid Biopsies for Molecular Biology-Based Radiotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

G M WallsCentre for Cancer Research & Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7AE, Northern Ireland. g.walls@qub.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0845-9732
L McConnellCentre for Cancer Research & Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7AE, Northern Ireland.
J McAleeseCancer Centre Belfast City Hospital, Belfast Health & Social Care Trust, 51 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7AB, Northern Ireland.
P MurrayNorthern Ireland Biobank, Health Sciences Building, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7AE, Northern Ireland.
T B LynchCancer Centre Belfast City Hospital, Belfast Health & Social Care Trust, 51 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7AB, Northern Ireland.
K SavageCentre for Cancer Research & Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7AE, Northern Ireland.
G G HannaSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
D Gonzalez de CastroCentre for Cancer Research & Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7AE, Northern Ireland.
Queen's University Belfast · GBThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe evaluation of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) from clinical blood samples, liquid biopsy, offers several diagnostic advantages compared with traditional tissue biopsy, such as shorter processing time, reduced patient risk and the opportunity to assess tumour heterogeneity. The historically poor sensitivity of ctDNA testing, has restricted its integration into routine clinical practice for non-metastatic disease. The early kinetics of ctDNA during radical radiotherapy for localised NSCLC have not been described with ultra-deep next generation sequencing previously. MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients with CT/PET-staged locally advanced, NSCLC prospectively consented to undergo serial venepuncture during the first week of radical radiotherapy alone. All patients received 55Gy in 20 fractions. Plasma samples were processed using the commercially available Roche AVENIO Expanded kit (Roche Sequencing Solutions, Pleasanton, CA, US) which targets 77 genes.

resultsTumour-specific mutations were found in all patients (1 in 3 patients; 2 in 1 patient, and 3 in 1 patient). The variant allele frequency of these mutations ranged from 0.05-3.35%. In 2 patients there was a transient increase in ctDNA levels at the 72 h timepoint compared to baseline. In all patients there was a non-significant decrease in ctDNA levels at the 7-day timepoint in comparison to baseline (p = 0.4627).

conclusionThis study demonstrates the feasibility of applying ctDNA-optimised NGS protocols through specified time-points in a small homogenous cohort of patients with localised lung cancer treated with radiotherapy. Studies are required to assess ctDNA kinetics as a predictive biomarker in radiotherapy. Priming tumours for liquid biopsy using radiation warrants further exploration.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCirculating Tumor DNAFeasibility StudiesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansKineticsLung NeoplasmsMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesCirculating Tumor DNActDNALung cancerRadical radiotherapyUltra-deep NGS

Identifiers

PMID32471446
PMCPMC7260736
OpenAlexW3029020673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.