ReviewJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2020
Laparoscopic omental flap for the treatment of thoracic aortic graft infection: report of two cases and review of the literature.
Review in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Omentum transplantation for malignant tumors: a narrative review of emerging techniques and clinical applications.European journal of medical research · 2025Review
- Current Research on the Use of the Omental Flap in Breast Reconstruction and Post-Mastectomy Lymphedema: A Focus on Omental-Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Robotic-assisted closed-chest management of a fungal-infected prosthetic aortic graft: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThoracic aortic graft infection (TAGI) is a rare and serious complication after surgery for which the treatment is controversial and challenging. Rather than following the traditional surgical strategy of graft replacement and extensive debridement, we have chosen to preserve the graft and cover it by a laparoscopic omental flap. In this article, we describe the clinical manifestation, diagnostic modalities, and treatment of this disease and analyze the role of laparoscopic omental flaps in its treatment. CASE PRESENTATION: We present two cases of thoracic aortic graft infections that had undergone surgical graft replacement for acute Stanford type A dissection. Their clinical manifestation of infection was atypical, with computed tomography suggesting infection of the grafts. Both patients were successfully treated with debridement, laparoscopic omental transposition, and antibiotics. The first case, a 55-year-old male, was found to have an infection at the aortic arch. The second case is a 52-year-old male who was found to have infection at the ascending aorta and arch. Surprisingly, both intraoperative cultures were negative. The infections were brought under control and the patients recovered steadily after surgery. Early follow-up results showed no signs of graft infection.
conclusionThese findings suggest that graft replacement for the treatment of TAGI is not always necessary in selected patients. Conservative surgical treatment, including laparoscopic omental transposition, is effective and less invasive for treating TAGI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.