Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32471437›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2020

Health-related quality of life among 13-14 year old adolescents with overweight-a mixed methods approach.

T K B Sundar, K Riiser, M C Småstuen, R Opheim, K Løndal, K Glavin, S Helseth

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

T K B SundarDepartment of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, P.O. Box 4, St. Olavs plass, NO-0130, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7862-9413
K RiiserDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, P.O. Box 4, St. Olavs plass, N-0130, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0801-1121
M C SmåstuenDepartment of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, P.O. Box 4, St. Olavs plass, NO-0130, Oslo, Norway.
R OpheimDepartment of Nursing Science, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, P. O. Box 1130, Blindern, N-0318, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0513-1435
K LøndalDepartment of Primary and Secondary Teacher Education, Faculty of Education and International Studies, Oslo Metropolitan University, P.O. Box 4, St. Olavs plass, N-0130, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7518-1342
K GlavinVID Specialized University, Faculty of Health Studies, P.O. Box 184, Vinderen, NO-0319, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6697-2764
S HelsethFaculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, P.O. Box 4, St. Olavs plass, N-0130, Oslo, Norway. solvi@oslomet.no.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6411-9057

Funding

Helsedirektoratet 01Norsk Sykepleierforbund 00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOverweight and obesity are public concerns with risk of adverse health outcomes. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is lower in adolescents than children in general. An increase in body mass index (BMI) is associated with a decrease in HRQoL. The purpose of this study was to measure and explore the HRQoL among adolescents with overweight or obesity who had participated in an intervention study, Young & Active, with the aim of increasing physical activity (PA), reducing BMI and promoting HRQoL.

methodsMixed methods, with a convergent design, were used to investigate how different methodological approaches could expand our understanding of the adolescents' HRQoL. Quantitative post-intervention data on HRQoL were collected among the 84 intervention participants, aged 13-14 years, using the KIDSCREEN 52 questionnaire. The data were compared with a Norwegian reference population of 244 individuals, and analysed using a non-parametric Mann-Whitney test. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 adolescents from the intervention. A directed approach to content analysis was adopted, using the ten sub-scales from KIDSCREEN 52.

resultsHRQoL in the intervention sample was significantly reduced on the sub-scale of physical well-being compared to the reference population. The reference population scored significantly lower than the intervention sample on the sub-scale of parent relation and home life. No significant differences were found on the other sub-scales. The qualitative data supported the quantitative findings on the sub-scale of physical well-being, but showed that perceptions of fitness, energy level or health could vary. Regarding parent relations, the interviewees extended this to include relationships to other family members as equally important. Most of the interviewees expressed a negative view of their bodies, but not their clothing or accessories. This may explain why no statistically significant differences were found on these aspects in the results from the KIDSCREEN questionnaire.

conclusionThe use of the KIDSCREEN 52 instrument gave important indications about the adolescents' HRQoL and need for additional follow up. The qualitative data provided an in-depth understanding that nuanced the findings and widened our knowledge of the adolescents HRQoL. Combining methods enabled a comprehensive approach to research on HRQoL.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdolescentBody Mass IndexCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleObesityQualitative ResearchReproducibility of ResultsResearch DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentsHealth-related quality of lifeMixed methodsObesityOverweightPhysical activity

Identifiers

PMID32471437
PMCPMC7260808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.