Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32471429›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

Volunteer responsibilities, motivations and challenges in implementation of the community-based health planning and services (CHPS) initiative in Ghana: qualitative evidence from two systems learning districts of the CHPS+ project.

Margaret Kweku, Emmanuel Manu, Hubert Amu, Fortress Yayra Aku, Martin Adjuik, Elvis Enowbeyang Tarkang, Joyce Komesuor, Geoffery Adebayor Asalu, Norbert N Amuna, Laud Ampomah Boateng and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Margaret KwekuSchool of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Hohoe, Ghana.
Emmanuel ManuSchool of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Hohoe, Ghana. emanu@uhas.edu.gh.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2724-3649
Hubert AmuSchool of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Hohoe, Ghana.
Fortress Yayra AkuSchool of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Hohoe, Ghana.
Martin AdjuikSchool of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Hohoe, Ghana.
Elvis Enowbeyang TarkangSchool of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Hohoe, Ghana.
Joyce KomesuorSchool of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Hohoe, Ghana.
Geoffery Adebayor AsaluSchool of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Hohoe, Ghana.
Norbert N AmunaSchool of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Hohoe, Ghana.
Laud Ampomah BoatengVolta Regional Health Directorate, Ghana Health Service, Ho, Ghana.
Justine Sefakor AlornyoVolta Regional Health Directorate, Ghana Health Service, Ho, Ghana.
Roland GloverVolta Regional Health Directorate, Ghana Health Service, Ho, Ghana.
Ayaga A BawahRegional Institute of Population Studies, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana.
Timothy LetsaVolta Regional Health Directorate, Ghana Health Service, Ho, Ghana.
John Koku Awoonor-WilliamsPolicy Planning Monitoring and Evaluation Division, Ghana Health Service, Accra, Ghana.
James F PhillipsMailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, USA.
John Owusu GyapongInstitute of Health Research, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana.
University of Health and Allied Sciences · GHGhana Health Service · GHColumbia University · USUniversity of Ghana · GH

Funding

Doris Duke Charitable Foundation 0000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity volunteerism is essential in the implementation of the Community-based Health Planning and Services (CHPS) in Ghana. We explored the responsibilities, motivations and challenges of community health management committees (CHMCs) in two CHPS+ Project districts in Ghana.

methodsWe used a qualitative approach to collect data through 4 focus group discussions among a purposive sample of community health volunteers in December 2018 and analysed them thematically.

resultsCommunity health management committees (CHMCs) were found to provide support in running the CHPS programme through resource mobilisation, monitoring of logistics, assisting the Community Health Officers (CHO) in the planning of CHPS activities, and the resolution of conflicts between CHOs and community members. The value, understanding and protective functions were the key motivations for serving on CHMCs. Financial, logistical and telecommunication challenges, lack of recognition and cooperation from community members, lack of motivation and lack of regular skill development training programmes for CHMC members who serve as traditional birth attendants (TBAs) were major challenges in CHMC volunteerism.

conclusionCommunity health volunteerism needs to be prioritised by the Ghana Health Service and other health sector stakeholders to make it attractive for members to give off their best in the discharge of their responsibilities.

Indexed as

Community Health PlanningCommunity Health ServicesCommunity Health WorkersGhanaHealth Services ResearchHumansMidwiferyMotivationQualitative ResearchRoleVolunteers

Identifiers

PMID32471429
PMCPMC7260774
OpenAlexW3029452964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.