Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32471351›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2020

Kaumātua Mana Motuhake: peer education intervention to help Māori elders during later-stage life transitions.

John G Oetzel, Michael P Cameron, Mary L Simpson, Rangimahora Reddy, Sophie Nock, Hineitimoana Greensill, Pare Meha, Kirsten Johnston, Truely Harding, Pita Shelford and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Age-Friendly Community Interventions for Health and Social Outcomes: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

John G OetzelUniversity of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton, 3240, New Zealand. john.oetzel@waikato.ac.nz.ORCID 0000-0003-3188-776X
Michael P CameronUniversity of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton, 3240, New Zealand.
Mary L SimpsonUniversity of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton, 3240, New Zealand.
Rangimahora ReddyRauawaawa Kaumātua Charitable Trust, 50 Colombo St., Hamilton, 3204, New Zealand.
Sophie NockUniversity of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton, 3240, New Zealand.
Hineitimoana GreensillUniversity of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton, 3240, New Zealand.
Pare MehaRauawaawa Kaumātua Charitable Trust, 50 Colombo St., Hamilton, 3204, New Zealand.
Kirsten JohnstonRauawaawa Kaumātua Charitable Trust, 50 Colombo St., Hamilton, 3204, New Zealand.
Truely HardingUniversity of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton, 3240, New Zealand.
Pita ShelfordUniversity of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton, 3240, New Zealand.
Linda Tuhiwai SmithUniversity of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton, 3240, New Zealand.
Brendan HokowhituUniversity of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton, 3240, New Zealand.

Funding

Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment UOOX1508, SUB1484
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAotearoa/New Zealand has a population that is ageing and there are challenges to health and social outcomes related to related to key life transitions (e.g., retirement, change in health conditions, loss of spouse). Further, there are significant inequities between Māori (Indigenous people) and non-Māori in ageing outcomes. The purpose of this study was to test the impacts and cost effectiveness of a tuakana/teina (peer education) intervention on kaumātua (elders) receiving the intervention. This study was framed by a strengths-based approach based on the key cultural concept of mana motuhake (autonomy and self-actualisation).

methodsThis study was grounded in principles of Kaupapa Māori and community-based participatory research to bring together a diverse group of stakeholders to co-develop and co-evaluate the intervention. The intervention had tuakana (peer educators) having conversations with up to six teina (recipients) and providing information related to health and social services. The research design was a pre- and post-test, clustered staggered design. Participants completed a baseline assessment of health and mana motuhake measures consistent with Māori worldviews along with two follow-up assessments (one after the first intervention group completed its activities and a second after the second intervention group completed its activities). Additionally, five focus groups and open-ended questions on the assessments were used to provide qualitative evaluation.

findingsA total of 180 kaumātua were recruited to the intervention with 121 completing it. The analysis revealed improvements over time in the expected direction on most of the variables. However, only three of the variables had statistically significant intervention effects: received support, tribal identity, and trouble paying bills. Qualitative results supported impacts of the intervention on mana motuhake, social connectedness, and tangible/information support related to services. Cost-effectiveness analysis showed that the intervention is cost effective, with a cost per QALY of less than the conventional threshold of three times gross domestic product per capita.

conclusionsThe findings support the relevancy and importance of kaumātua knowledge to create a strengths-based approach to improve health and social outcomes. This study demonstrates that a contextually based and culturally safe age-friendly environments can facilitate engagement and participation by kaumātua for kaumātua. TRIAL REGISTRY: Australia New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12617001396314); Date Registered: 3 October 2017 (retrospectively registered); https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=373733&isClinicalTrial=False.

Indexed as

Peer GroupAgedAgingCommunicationHumansNew ZealandCommunity-based participatory researchKaupapa MāoriMana motuhakePeer educationPositive ageingTuakana-teina

Identifiers

PMID32471351
PMCPMC7260849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.