Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32471211›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2020

A Deep-Learning Approach toward Rational Molecular Docking Protocol Selection.

José Jiménez-Luna, Alberto Cuzzolin, Giovanni Bolcato, Mattia Sturlese, Stefano Moro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Drug Discovery forInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Structure-basedComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

José Jiménez-LunaDepartment of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, RETHINK, ETH Zuerich, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 4, 8093 Zuerich, Switzerland.
Alberto CuzzolinMolecular Modeling Section, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy.
Giovanni BolcatoMolecular Modeling Section, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy.
Mattia SturleseMolecular Modeling Section, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3944-0313
Stefano MoroMolecular Modeling Section, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7514-3802

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While a plethora of different protein-ligand docking protocols have been developed over the past twenty years, their performances greatly depend on the provided input protein-ligand pair. In this study, we developed a machine-learning model that uses a combination of convolutional and fully connected neural networks for the task of predicting the performance of several popular docking protocols given a protein structure and a small compound. We also rigorously evaluated the performance of our model using a widely available database of protein-ligand complexes and different types of data splits. We further open-source all code related to this study so that potential users can make informed selections on which protocol is best suited for their particular protein-ligand pair.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMachine LearningCheminformaticsDatabases, ProteinMolecular Docking Simulationchemoinformaticsdeep learningmolecular dockingstructural biology

Identifiers

PMID32471211
PMCPMC7321124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.