Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32471205›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Prediction of Novel Inhibitors of the Main Protease (M-pro) of SARS-CoV-2 through Consensus Docking and Drug Reposition.

Aleix Gimeno, Júlia Mestres-Truyol, María José Ojeda-Montes, Guillem Macip, Bryan Saldivar-Espinoza, Adrià Cereto-Massagué, Gerard Pujadas, Santiago Garcia-Vallvé

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
21.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 166 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Proof-of-concept studies with a computationally designed MProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Progress of the "Molecular Informatics" Section in 2022.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aleix GimenoDepartament de Bioquímica i Biotecnologia, Research group in Cheminformatics & Nutrition, Campus de Sescelades, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43007 Tarragona, Catalonia, Spain.
Júlia Mestres-TruyolDepartament de Bioquímica i Biotecnologia, Research group in Cheminformatics & Nutrition, Campus de Sescelades, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43007 Tarragona, Catalonia, Spain.
María José Ojeda-MontesEscoles Universitàries Gimbernat i Tomàs Cerdà, 08174 Sant Cugat del Vallès, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Guillem MacipDepartament de Bioquímica i Biotecnologia, Research group in Cheminformatics & Nutrition, Campus de Sescelades, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43007 Tarragona, Catalonia, Spain.
Bryan Saldivar-EspinozaDepartament de Bioquímica i Biotecnologia, Research group in Cheminformatics & Nutrition, Campus de Sescelades, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43007 Tarragona, Catalonia, Spain.
Adrià Cereto-MassaguéDepartament de Bioquímica i Biotecnologia, Research group in Cheminformatics & Nutrition, Campus de Sescelades, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43007 Tarragona, Catalonia, Spain.
Gerard PujadasDepartament de Bioquímica i Biotecnologia, Research group in Cheminformatics & Nutrition, Campus de Sescelades, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43007 Tarragona, Catalonia, Spain.
Santiago Garcia-VallvéDepartament de Bioquímica i Biotecnologia, Research group in Cheminformatics & Nutrition, Campus de Sescelades, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43007 Tarragona, Catalonia, Spain.
Universitat Rovira i Virgili · ESTechnological Center of Nutrition and Health · ESMedian SCP (Spain) · ES

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 713679
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in December 2019 and its rapid spread worldwide, the scientific community has been under pressure to react and make progress in the development of an effective treatment against the virus responsible for the disease. Here, we implement an original virtual screening (VS) protocol for repositioning approved drugs in order to predict which of them could inhibit the main protease of the virus (M-pro), a key target for antiviral drugs given its essential role in the virus' replication. Two different libraries of approved drugs were docked against the structure of M-pro using Glide, FRED and AutoDock Vina, and only the equivalent high affinity binding modes predicted simultaneously by the three docking programs were considered to correspond to bioactive poses. In this way, we took advantage of the three sampling algorithms to generate hypothetic binding modes without relying on a single scoring function to rank the results. Seven possible SARS-CoV-2 M-pro inhibitors were predicted using this approach: Perampanel, Carprofen, Celecoxib, Alprazolam, Trovafloxacin, Sarafloxacin and ethyl biscoumacetate. Carprofen and Celecoxib have been selected by the COVID Moonshot initiative for in vitro testing; they show 3.97 and 11.90% M-pro inhibition at 50 µM, respectively.

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsBetacoronavirusBinding SitesCarbazolesCelecoxibCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Drug RepositioningHumansMolecular Docking SimulationMutation, MissensePandemicsPneumonia, ViralProtease InhibitorsProtein Structure, TertiarySARS-CoV-2Antiviral AgentsCarbazolescarprofenCelecoxibM-proteaseProtease InhibitorsSubtilisinsViral Proteins2019-nCov3CL-prochymotrypsin-like proteaseCOVID-19M-proSARS coronavirusSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID32471205
PMCPMC7312484
OpenAlexW3028648654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.