ArticleCells2020
The Pluripotency Factor Nanog Protects against Neuronal Amyloid β-Induced Toxicity and Oxidative Stress through Insulin Sensitivity Restoration.
Article in Cells, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells with a C9orf72 expansion as a model to study frontotemporal dementia pathologies.Molecular biology of the cell · 2025Article
- Neuroprotective Effects of Black Raspberry Extract Against β-Amyloid-Induced Cytotoxicity in HT-22 Cells.Food science & nutrition · 2025Article
- Type 3 diabetes and metabolic reprogramming of brain neurons: causes and therapeutic strategies.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Review
- Melatonin Augments the Expression of Core Transcription Factors in Aged and Alzheimer's Patient Skin Fibroblasts.Biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Amyloid β (Aβ) is a peptide fragment of the amyloid precursor protein that triggers the progression of Alzheimer's Disease (AD). It is believed that Aβ contributes to neurodegeneration in several ways, including mitochondria dysfunction, oxidative stress and brain insulin resistance. Therefore, protecting neurons from Aβ-induced neurotoxicity is an effective strategy for attenuating AD pathogenesis. Recently, applications of stem cell-based therapies have demonstrated the ability to reduce the progression and outcome of neurodegenerative diseases. Particularly, Nanog is recognized as a stem cell-related pluripotency factor that enhances self-renewing capacities and helps reduce the senescent phenotypes of aged neuronal cells. However, whether the upregulation of Nanog can be an effective approach to alleviate Aβ-induced neurotoxicity and senescence is not yet understood. In the present study, we transiently overexpressed Nanog-both in vitro and in vivo-and investigated the protective effects and underlying mechanisms against Aβ. We found that overexpression of Nanog is responsible for attenuating Aβ-triggered neuronal insulin resistance, which restores cell survival through reducing intracellular mitochondrial superoxide accumulation and cellular senescence. In addition, upregulation of Nanog expression appears to increase secretion of neurotrophic factors through activation of the Nrf2 antioxidant defense pathway. Furthermore, improvement of memory and learning were also observed in rat model of Aβ neurotoxicity mediated by upregulation of Nanog in the brain. Taken together, our study suggests a potential role for Nanog in attenuating the neurotoxic effects of Aβ, which in turn, suggests that strategies to enhance Nanog expression may be used as a novel intervention for reducing Aβ neurotoxicity in the AD brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.