ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Antimicrobial Resistance in Humans and Animals: Rapid Review of Psychological and Behavioral Determinants.
Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identifying and mapping key relationships and communication pathways influencing farmers' antibiotic use in production animals: a scoping review.One health outlook · 2026Review
- Understanding antimicrobial use by equine owners in Wales: Using cross-sectional survey and semi-structured interviews.Equine veterinary journal · 2026Article
- The role of gut microbiome in antimicrobial resistance transmission between companion animals and livestock: mechanisms, drivers, and One Health implications.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Minding the knowledge-action gap: Results from a mixed-methods study of antimicrobial use among dairy farmers in central Uganda.PloS one · 2026Article
- Antimicrobials as cornerstones and quick fixes Zimbabwean in healthcare and society: Health practitioners´ critical reflections on two stories of antimicrobial use as part of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) education.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Regulations on the Use of Antibiotics in Livestock Production in South America: A Comparative Literature Analysis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Current Insights Regarding the Role of Farm Animals in the Spread of Antimicrobial Resistance from a One Health Perspective.Veterinary sciences · 2022Review
- Emotive Themes from Tennessee Cattle Producers Regarding Responsible Antibiotic Use.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Understanding Vaccine Hesitancy in Vietnamese Fish Farmers.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Fijian Farmers' Attitude and Knowledge Towards Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Livestock Production Systems-A Qualitative Study.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- A rapid evidence assessment exploring whether antimicrobial resistance complicates non-infectious health conditions and healthcare services, 2010-20.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2021Review
- Treatment Processes for Microbial Resistance Mitigation: The Technological Contribution to Tackle the Problem of Antibiotic Resistance.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A rapid review of current evidence examining psychological issues regarding the use of antibiotics and antimicrobials and resistance to these in both human and animal populations was conducted. Specific areas of interest were studies examining psychological determinants of AMR and interventions which attempt to change behavior with regard to AMR in the general population; animals; and fish, in particular. Although there is some evidence of the effectiveness of behavior change in general human populations, there is limited evidence in farmed animals, with a particular dearth in fish farming. We conclude there is an urgent need for more psychological research to identify major barriers and facilitators to change and evaluate the effectiveness of theory-based interventions aimed at reducing AM use in food production animals, including the promotion of alternatives to AMs, such as vaccination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.