Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32470603›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases2020

Early network properties of the COVID-19 pandemic - The Chinese scenario.

Ariel L Rivas, José L Febles, Stephen D Smith, Almira L Hoogesteijn, George P Tegos, Folorunso O Fasina, James B Hittner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Geospatial Analysis of COVID-19: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ariel L RivasCenter for Global Health, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, USA.
José L FeblesDepartment of Human Ecology, CINVESTAV-IPN, Mérida, Mexico.
Stephen D SmithInstitute for Resource Information Science, College of Agriculture, Cornell University, Ithaca, USA.
Almira L HoogesteijnDepartment of Human Ecology, CINVESTAV-IPN, Mérida, Mexico.
George P TegosMicromoria LLC, Marlborough, MA, USA.
Folorunso O FasinaFood and Agriculture Organization, Dar es Salam, Tanzania & Department of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, University of Pretoria, South Africa. Electronic address: Folorunso.fasina@fao.org.
James B HittnerDepartment of Psychology, College of Charleston, Charleston, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo control epidemics, sites more affected by mortality should be identified.

methodsDefining epidemic nodes as areas that included both most fatalities per time unit and connections, such as highways, geo-temporal Chinese data on the COVID-19 epidemic were investigated with linear, logarithmic, power, growth, exponential, and logistic regression models. A z-test compared the slopes observed.

resultsTwenty provinces suspected to act as epidemic nodes were empirically investigated. Five provinces displayed synchronicity, long-distance connections, directionality and assortativity - network properties that helped discriminate epidemic nodes. The rank I node included most fatalities and was activated first. Fewer deaths were reported, later, by rank II and III nodes, while the data from rank I-III nodes exhibited slopes, the data from the remaining provinces did not. The power curve was the best fitting model for all slopes. Because all pairs (rank I vs. rank II, rank I vs. rank III, and rank II vs. rank III) of epidemic nodes differed statistically, rank I-III epidemic nodes were geo-temporally and statistically distinguishable.

conclusionsThe geo-temporal progression of epidemics seems to be highly structured. Epidemic network properties can distinguish regions that differ in mortality. This real-time geo-referenced analysis can inform both decision-makers and clinicians.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusChinaCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19HumansLogistic ModelsPandemicsPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2Spatio-Temporal AnalysisCOVID-19Geo-referencedInterdisciplinaryNetwork-theorySmallworld

Identifiers

PMID32470603
PMCPMC7250076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.