Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32470094›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Different wheat cultivars exhibit variable responses to inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from organic and conventional farms.

David García de León, Tanel Vahter, Martin Zobel, Mati Koppel, Liina Edesi, John Davison, Saleh Al-Quraishy, Wael N Hozzein, Mari Moora, Jane Oja and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. AMF species do matter:Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Metagenomic and Gene Expression Analysis in Wheat (International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

David García de LeónDepartment of Life Sciences, Technological Science Campus, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8165-6965
Tanel VahterInstitute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Martin ZobelZoology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mati KoppelEstonian Crop Research Institute, Jõgeva, Estonia.
Liina EdesiEstonian Crop Research Institute, Jõgeva, Estonia.
John DavisonInstitute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Saleh Al-QuraishyZoology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Wael N HozzeinZoology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mari MooraInstitute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Jane OjaInstitute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Martti VasarInstitute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Maarja ÖpikInstitute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study aimed to investigate the effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungal communities originating from organic and conventional agriculture on wheat growth and yield. Six different spring wheat cultivars released in different years in north and central European countries were considered. We hypothesised that AM fungal inoculum collected from organic agricultural fields would elicit a greater positive growth response than inoculum collected from conventional agricultural fields; and that older cultivars, which were developed under conditions of low fertilizer input, would exhibit overall greater growth responses to the presence of AM fungi, compared with more recent cultivars, and that AM fungal inoculum from conventional fields might have the most beneficial effect on the growth and yield of recent cultivars. The results showed that the overall effects on the growth and yield of spring wheat grown with organic and conventional AM fungal inocula did not differ greatly. However, the inoculation growth response, showing the difference of the effects of organic and conventional inocula, varied between particular wheat cultivars. Inoculation growth response of the cultivar Pikker (released in 1959) was the most positive, while that of the cultivar Arabella (released in 2012) was the most negative. The use of AM fungal inoculum from organic fields resulted in slightly taller plant individuals. Pikker showed relatively higher yield and stronger growth when the organic AM fungal inoculum was used. Arabella exhibited relatively lower yield and weaker growth when the organic inoculum was used. Whether the positive response of Pikker to Estonian organic inoculation reflects adaptation to the locally occurring AM fungal community needs to be established by further studies of the communities of AM fungi colonizing wheat roots.

Indexed as

FarmsOrganic AgricultureMycorrhizaePlant RootsPlant ShootsSoilSoil MicrobiologyTriticumSoil

Identifiers

PMID32470094
PMCPMC7259642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.