Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32470083›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Inter-professional teamwork and its association with patient safety in German hospitals-A cross sectional study.

Julia Dinius, Rebecca Philipp, Nicole Ernstmann, Lina Heier, Anja S Göritz, Stefanie Pfisterer-Heise, Judith Hammerschmidt, Corinna Bergelt, Antje Hammer, Mirjam Körner

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Attitudes of Clinicians and Patient Safety Culture Before and After the ARRIVE Trial.Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Julia DiniusMedical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Medical Faculty, Albert-Ludwigs-University, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0750-7886
Rebecca PhilippDepartment of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Nicole ErnstmannInstitute for Patient Safety, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Lina HeierInstitute for Patient Safety, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Anja S GöritzOccupational and Consumer Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Albert-Ludwigs-University, Freiburg, Germany.
Stefanie Pfisterer-HeiseDepartment of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0138-4865
Judith HammerschmidtInstitute for Patient Safety, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Corinna BergeltDepartment of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Antje HammerInstitute for Patient Safety, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2724-9901
Mirjam KörnerMedical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Medical Faculty, Albert-Ludwigs-University, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInter-professional teamwork is a prominent factor in quality of care and may lead to improved patient safety. Although team members' points of view are highly relevant when trying to improve inpatient procedures, there is a lack of systematic assessment of their perceptions. Therefore, study aims were to explore inter-professional teamwork, safety-related behavior, and patient safety in German hospitals from team members' point of view. Furthermore, we wanted to examine the association between inter-professional teamwork and safety-related behavior as well as the association between inter-professional teamwork and patient safety.

methodsWe used cross-sectional pre-intervention data of a multicenter longitudinal study (German KOMPAS project). We gathered descriptive statistics for sample characteristics and to describe the current state of inter-professional teamwork, safety-related behavior, and patient safety. We used one-way variance analyses to assess differences between groups, and linear regression analyses to examine the association between inter-professional teamwork and the outcomes safety-related behavior, and patient safety.

results326 inpatient care team members participated in the study. Participants perceived a moderate to high level of inter-professional teamwork, and a moderate level of patient safety. Moreover, they reached rather high values in safety-related behavior. Professional group, work experience, and period of employment had an impact on the perceptions of inter-professional teamwork, and patient safety. Higher inter-professional teamwork was associated with better patient safety. We did not find an association between inter-professional teamwork and safety-related behavior.

conclusionsBased on the association between inter-professional teamwork and patient safety, we recommend the implementation of team interventions. Because professional group, period of employment, and work experience had an impact on the perceptions of inter-professional teamwork and patient safety, we suggest future qualitative research to explore reasons for caregivers' critical evaluation. Moreover, we recommend longitudinal studies to reveal causal relationships, and subsequently to determine areas of improvement for a safer health care.

Indexed as

HospitalsPatient Care TeamPatient SafetyAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCooperative BehaviorCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID32470083
PMCPMC7259596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.