Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32470070›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Mortality as the primary constraint to enhancing nutritional and financial gains from poultry: A multi-year longitudinal study of smallholder farmers in western Kenya.

Elkanah Otiang, Zoë A Campbell, Samuel M Thumbi, Lucy W Njagi, Philip N Nyaga, Guy H Palmer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Vaccination of household chickens results in a shift in young children's diet and improves child growth in rural Kenya.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance patterns ofJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elkanah OtiangUniversity of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Zoë A CampbellPaul G. Allen School for Global Animal Health, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4759-9976
Samuel M ThumbiUniversity of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Lucy W NjagiUniversity of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Philip N NyagaUniversity of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Guy H PalmerUniversity of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0001-5679-4709

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChickens are a widely held economic and nutritional asset in rural Africa and are frequently managed by women. Despite potential benefits of larger flock sizes, the average number of chickens kept at the household level is reported to be low. Whether this reflects decision-making to maximize benefits per unit labor by voluntary reduction of chicken numbers by consumption or sale versus involuntary losses due to mortality is a significant gap in knowledge relevant to improving smallholder household welfare.

methodsIn a 4-year longitudinal study of 1,908 smallholder households in rural western Kenya, the number of chickens owned by quarterly census at each household was determined. Households reported gains and losses of chicken over the immediate previous quarter. Gains were classified as on-farm or off-farm; losses were classified as voluntary (sales, gifts, consumption) or involuntary (mortality, unclassified loss).

resultsThe mean number of chickens owned over the 16 quarters was 10, consistent with prior cross-sectional data. Involuntary losses represented 70% of total off-take, while voluntary off-take represented the remaining 30%. Mortality composed 60% of total reported off-take and accounted for most of the involuntary losses. Household consumption, sales, and gifts represented 18%, 9%, and 3% of off-take, respectively.

conclusionThe overwhelming majority of off-take can be classified as involuntary off-take, principally due to mortality, that does not reflect the owner's decision to maximize value through nutritional gain, income, or social capital. This strongly suggests that there is substantial opportunity to enhance the value of chickens as an asset, both nutritional and income generating, for smallholder households living at poverty level. Our findings suggest that programs emphasizing community level poultry vaccination and feed supplementation are much more likely to be effective than those solely focused on providing chickens.

Indexed as

FarmersIncomeMortalityNutritional StatusPoultryRural PopulationAnimalsChickensCross-Sectional StudiesFarmsHumansKenyaLongitudinal StudiesMalePoverty

Identifiers

PMID32470070
PMCPMC7259595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.