Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32470041›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Oral Immunization with HIV-1 Envelope SOSIP trimers elicits systemic immune responses and cross-reactive anti-V1V2 antibodies in non-human primates.

Bridget S Fisher, Nicholas Dambrauskas, Olesya Trakhimets, Daniela V Andrade, Jeremy Smedley, Donald L Sodora, D Noah Sather

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Bacterial Ghosts ofVaccines · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bridget S FisherSeattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Nicholas DambrauskasSeattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Olesya TrakhimetsSeattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Daniela V AndradeSeattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Jeremy SmedleyWashington National Primate Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3369-4662
Donald L SodoraSeattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
D Noah SatherSeattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9128-172X
University of Washington · US

Funding

Harnessing oral mucosa vaccination to drive protective HIV antibody responsesR01DE026336 · NIDCR · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI SATHER, D. NOAH, SODORA, DONALD L · 2016 to 2020
$4.1M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE026336
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Development of a successful HIV vaccine is dependent upon a determination of the optimum antigen and adjuvant as well as choosing an optimal site for vaccine delivery. The site of delivery is particularly relevant as HIV transmission generally requires that the virus crosses a mucosal membrane to infect a new host. Here we undertake a pilot study comparing three vaccine delivery routes, two to the oral cavity (intraepithelial (iEp) and needle-free (NF-Injex)) as well as intramuscular (IM) delivery. These vaccinations utilized a recombinant HIV-1 Env trimer 10042.05 from an elite neutralizer, subject VC10042, that has previously induced high titers of cross-clade reactive V1V2 antibodies. The 10042.05.SOSIP fused trimer was administered with adjuvants R848 (Resiquimod), MPLA and Alhydrogel to characterize the innate cellular and anti-HIV Envelope (Env) antibody responses following the administration of the vaccine to the oral mucosa. Oral delivery of the 10042.05.SOSIP induced high titers of anti-V1V2 antibodies, which together with previous studies, indicates an immunogenic bias toward the V1V2 regions in 10042-derived Envs. Both types of oral vaccine delivery resulted in immunologic and serologic responses that were comparable to the IM delivery route. Furthermore, induction of anti-V1-V2 specific antibodies was best following iEp delivery of the oral vaccine identifying this as the optimal method to orally deliver this vaccine formulation.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAdministration, OralAIDS VaccinesAnimalsCross ReactionsHIV-1HIV InfectionsImidazolesMacaca mulattaPilot ProjectsViral Envelope ProteinsAdjuvants, ImmunologicAIDS VaccinesImidazolesresiquimodViral Envelope Proteins

Identifiers

PMID32470041
PMCPMC7259690
OpenAlexW3030573506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.