Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32470035›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Environmental DNA: A promising factor for tuberculosis risk assessment in multi-host settings.

Jordi Martínez-Guijosa, Beatriz Romero, José Antonio Infantes-Lorenzo, Elena Díez, Mariana Boadella, Ana Balseiro, Miguel Veiga, David Navarro, Inmaculada Moreno, Javier Ferreres and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evidence ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Population structure and history ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jordi Martínez-GuijosaSaBio, IREC (UCLM-CSIC-JCCM), Ciudad Real, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9553-7673
Beatriz RomeroVISAVET Health Surveillance Centre, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
José Antonio Infantes-LorenzoVISAVET Health Surveillance Centre, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Elena DíezLivestock Service, Department of Rural Development, Environment and Local Administration, Government of Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.
Mariana BoadellaSABIOTEC, Edificio Polivalente UCLM, Ciudad Real, Spain.
Ana BalseiroSERIDA, Regional Service for Agrifood Research and Development, Asturias, Spain.
Miguel VeigaSaBio, IREC (UCLM-CSIC-JCCM), Ciudad Real, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4115-5987
David NavarroLivestock Service, Department of Rural Development, Environment and Local Administration, Government of Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.
Inmaculada MorenoArea of Immunology, Microbial and Immunogenetic Immunology Unit, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
Javier FerreresSaBio, IREC (UCLM-CSIC-JCCM), Ciudad Real, Spain.
Mercedes DomínguezArea of Immunology, Microbial and Immunogenetic Immunology Unit, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
Cesar FernándezLivestock Service, Department of Rural Development, Environment and Local Administration, Government of Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.
Lucas DomínguezVISAVET Health Surveillance Centre, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Christian GortázarSaBio, IREC (UCLM-CSIC-JCCM), Ciudad Real, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attaining and maintaining the Official Tuberculosis Free status continues to be a challenge when several domestic and wild hosts contribute to the maintenance of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTC). Local tuberculosis hotspots are sometimes identified in cattle in low-prevalence regions. We have, therefore, studied one such hotspot in depth in order to produce an epidemiological diagnosis. Host population size and MTC prevalence were estimated in selected wildlife and in livestock, while on-cattle environmental DNA detection was additionally used as a proxy for risk of exposure at the farm (herd) level. Positive skin test reactors were found on16 of the 24 cattle farms studied in the period 2012-2016. Although all goats tested negative to the skin test during this period, MTC was confirmed in four sheep at slaughter, thus indicating an unknown prevalence of infection in this host species. With regard to wildlife, the prevalence of MTC infection based on culture was 8.8% in the case of wild boar (Sus scrofa), and the only road-killed badger (Meles meles) submitted for culture tested positive. Two criteria were employed to divide the cattle farms into higher or lower risk: tuberculosis testing results and environmental DNA detection. Environmental MTC DNA detection yielded significant differences regarding "use of regional pastures" and "proximity to woodland". This study suggests that on-animal environmental DNA sampling may help when assessing contact risk as regards MTC in livestock at the herd level. This tool opens up new avenues of epidemiological research in complex multi-host settings.

Indexed as

Risk AssessmentAnimalsCattleDNA, EnvironmentalFarmsRisk FactorsTuberculosisDNA, Environmental

Identifiers

PMID32470035
PMCPMC7259669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.